Calibrating gene-set nulls for imaging transcriptomics with planted truths

Background. Imaging-transcriptomic studies guard map–gene-set correlations with spatial and gene nulls, the strongest common gene null being coexpression-matched sampling. Neither has been calibrated with planted positives in the tissue-class and coherent-set regime where published claims sit. Methods. On Allen Human Brain Atlas expression, we planted maps and gene sets of known truth and measured false-alarm and catch rates under a frozen, amended preregistration. Results. Joint spatial surrogates were anticonservative where tissue classes differed in mean (false-alarm rate .078–.120); class-stratified surrogates were nominal. Coexpression-matched gene nulls were anticonservative for coherent sets (.196–.210; within a brain background, .399–.442), also in Cao et al.'s own regime, above the fitted coherence crossing for published-like sets. Ecology's fourth-corner max test, with constrained map-side and gene-side legs (α = .025), stayed ≤ .019 in all 390 verdict strata (gene-side leg alone ≤ .022 in 372 more), calibrated on every informative planted stratum within stated scope limits, but caught .585–.666 of strong gene-specific plants. On a preregistered register of published autism claims, the interim result (two of three release batches) is 0 of 16 population units surviving; the third batch's 196 units have not run and are counted neither way, and 9 rows (Dear et al., 3; Vairam, Roy et al., 6) are deferred. The one tested unit could not have survived (gene-side null uninformative; power unmeasured in its class). Conclusions. Gene-set nulls need planted-truth calibration in the coherence regime of the sets they test; a max test holds its level there, at measured cost in power. This record holds the preprint (PDF) and its archive: code, frozen preregistration and amendments, claims register, result files, figure and table scripts, and the manuscript source. Third-party brain maps are not redistributed. No individual-level or controlled-access data are included. Code is MIT-licensed; text, protocol, results and figures are CC BY 4.0.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24130309
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Calibrating gene-set nulls for imaging transcriptomics with planted truths

Radoslav Lovecky
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
preprint

Calibrating gene-set nulls for imaging transcriptomics with planted truths

Radoslav Lovecky
preprint en

Abstract

Background. Imaging-transcriptomic studies guard map–gene-set correlations with spatial and gene nulls, the strongest common gene null being coexpression-matched sampling. Neither has been calibrated with planted positives in the tissue-class and coherent-set regime where published claims sit. Methods. On Allen Human Brain Atlas expression, we planted maps and gene sets of known truth and measured false-alarm and catch rates under a frozen, amended preregistration. Results. Joint spatial surrogates were anticonservative where tissue classes differed in mean (false-alarm rate .078–.120); class-stratified surrogates were nominal. Coexpression-matched gene nulls were anticonservative for coherent sets (.196–.210; within a brain background, .399–.442), also in Cao et al.'s own regime, above the fitted coherence crossing for published-like sets. Ecology's fourth-corner max test, with constrained map-side and gene-side legs (α = .025), stayed ≤ .019 in all 390 verdict strata (gene-side leg alone ≤ .022 in 372 more), calibrated on every informative planted stratum within stated scope limits, but caught .585–.666 of strong gene-specific plants. On a preregistered register of published autism claims, the interim result (two of three release batches) is 0 of 16 population units surviving; the third batch's 196 units have not run and are counted neither way, and 9 rows (Dear et al., 3; Vairam, Roy et al., 6) are deferred. The one tested unit could not have survived (gene-side null uninformative; power unmeasured in its class). Conclusions. Gene-set nulls need planted-truth calibration in the coherence regime of the sets they test; a max test holds its level there, at measured cost in power. This record holds the preprint (PDF) and its archive: code, frozen preregistration and amendments, claims register, result files, figure and table scripts, and the manuscript source. Third-party brain maps are not redistributed. No individual-level or controlled-access data are included. Code is MIT-licensed; text, protocol, results and figures are CC BY 4.0.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon