Development of Predictive Models for Post-Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic Fistula: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Internal versus External Drainage Systems

Abstract Purpose This study analyzes risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) across different pancreatic fluid drainage techniques, aiming to inform surgical strategy selection, clinical interventions, and complication prevention. Methods A total of 273 patients who underwent PD were included. They were divided into pancreatic fistula and non-fistula groups, and a predictive model for POPF was developed and validated. Patients were then further classified into internal and external drainage groups. Separate POPF prediction models were built for each group to identify group-specific risk factors. Results The risk factors associated with POPF in all patients undergoing PD include: a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m², biliary drainage, blood transfusion and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (IPJ) ( P < 0.05). Patients in the non-fistula group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative levels of biochemical tests, as well as a reduced duration of abdominal drainage and shorter hospital stays ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, variables that were significantly associated with POPF among patients in the internal drainage groups included: BMI > 25 kg/m², blood transfusion and IPJ; conversely, for external drainage groups, significant associations were identified with biliary drainage and blood transfusion ( P < 0.05). The predictive model exhibited acceptable predictive capability as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test results: H-L test = 0.071 and area under the curve (AUC) = 0.684 for internal drainage groups; H-L test = 0.131 and AUC = 0.743 for external drainage groups. Conclusion BMI > 25 kg/m², blood transfusion and IPJ are recognized as independent risk factors for POPF. In patients with a BMI > 25kg/m², undergoing internal drainage and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy may elevate the incidence of POPF; conversely, external drainage does not exhibit a significant impact. Therefore, in clinical practice, for obese patients with a BMI > 25kg/m²—particularly those presenting additional risk factors—it is advisable to consider external drainage and to perform pancreaticojejunostomy utilizing a duct-to-mucosa approach. This strategy may contribute to a reduction in the incidence of POPF and facilitate postoperative recovery in these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11141160/v1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Development of Predictive Models for Post-Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic Fistula: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Internal versus External Drainage Systems

刘玮楠, Bingzhang Tian, Shuo Qi, Changjun Liu et al.
Research Square
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
preprint

Development of Predictive Models for Post-Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreatic Fistula: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Internal versus External Drainage Systems

刘玮楠, Bingzhang Tian, Shuo Qi, Changjun Liu, Z Song, Wei Cheng, Weishun Huang, Chen Zou, Xiaofeng Liu, Kang Chen
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study analyzes risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) across different pancreatic fluid drainage techniques, aiming to inform surgical strategy selection, clinical interventions, and complication prevention. Methods A total of 273 patients who underwent PD were included. They were divided into pancreatic fistula and non-fistula groups, and a predictive model for POPF was developed and validated. Patients were then further classified into internal and external drainage groups. Separate POPF prediction models were built for each group to identify group-specific risk factors. Results The risk factors associated with POPF in all patients undergoing PD include: a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m², biliary drainage, blood transfusion and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (IPJ) ( P < 0.05). Patients in the non-fistula group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative levels of biochemical tests, as well as a reduced duration of abdominal drainage and shorter hospital stays ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, variables that were significantly associated with POPF among patients in the internal drainage groups included: BMI > 25 kg/m², blood transfusion and IPJ; conversely, for external drainage groups, significant associations were identified with biliary drainage and blood transfusion ( P < 0.05). The predictive model exhibited acceptable predictive capability as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test results: H-L test = 0.071 and area under the curve (AUC) = 0.684 for internal drainage groups; H-L test = 0.131 and AUC = 0.743 for external drainage groups. Conclusion BMI > 25 kg/m², blood transfusion and IPJ are recognized as independent risk factors for POPF. In patients with a BMI > 25kg/m², undergoing internal drainage and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy may elevate the incidence of POPF; conversely, external drainage does not exhibit a significant impact. Therefore, in clinical practice, for obese patients with a BMI > 25kg/m²—particularly those presenting additional risk factors—it is advisable to consider external drainage and to perform pancreaticojejunostomy utilizing a duct-to-mucosa approach. This strategy may contribute to a reduction in the incidence of POPF and facilitate postoperative recovery in these patients.

Research Square
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon