Atomic Clock Comparisons as Bounds on Fundamental Decoherence: A Computed Conversion

This paper converts the fractional frequency stability of optical atomic clocks into an upper bound on any fundamental decoherence rate affecting the clock transition. For a strontium-like transition at 4.29e+14 hertz with fractional instability 1.00e-18, the bound is 2.695e-03 per second. A representative Planck-suppressed rate evaluated for comparison is 6.934e-19 per second, a factor 3.887e+15 below the clock bound. Clocks are therefore excellent bounds on decoherence that couples directly to internal energy splittings at observable strength, but they do not reach Planck-suppressed rates in the simple linear suppression model. The study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24145196
Primary Topic
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Atomic Clock Comparisons as Bounds on Fundamental Decoherence: A Computed Conversion

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
article

Atomic Clock Comparisons as Bounds on Fundamental Decoherence: A Computed Conversion

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

This paper converts the fractional frequency stability of optical atomic clocks into an upper bound on any fundamental decoherence rate affecting the clock transition. For a strontium-like transition at 4.29e+14 hertz with fractional instability 1.00e-18, the bound is 2.695e-03 per second. A representative Planck-suppressed rate evaluated for comparison is 6.934e-19 per second, a factor 3.887e+15 below the clock bound. Clocks are therefore excellent bounds on decoherence that couples directly to internal energy splittings at observable strength, but they do not reach Planck-suppressed rates in the simple linear suppression model. The study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon