Psychometric Evidence for the Reading Screening Test–Digital Version in Portuguese Grade 1 Students

Early identification of reading difficulties may facilitate timely assessment, monitoring, and educational support. This study examined validity evidence for the Reading Screening Test–Digital Version (TRL-DV) among Grade 1 students in Portugal. A validation sample (N = 208) was used to examine internal structure, internal consistency, relations with external variables, and classification accuracy. An independent large psychometric sample (N = 2708) was used to examine internal structure, internal consistency, item functioning, precision, and item reach. The operational total score showed high internal consistency in both samples (KR-20 = 0.928 and 0.952), although these values may be inflated by common sequences of zero scores associated with unreached items. The correlated two-factor model outperformed the unidimensional model on several fit indices but did not yield a consistently admissible, adequately fitting solution. Scores correlated positively with word and pseudoword reading, rapid automatized naming, digit span, and teachers’ literacy grades. Item position and the decreasing probability of reaching later items contributed substantially to operational performance. An exploratory ROC analysis against a sample-derived criterion yielded AUC = 0.920. The findings support interpreting the total score as an indicator of decoding-related reading performance under timed digital administration and suggest potential screening value; component scores and classification thresholds require further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16111932
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Psychometric Evidence for the Reading Screening Test–Digital Version in Portuguese Grade 1 Students

Ana Sucena, Cátia Marques, Eliana Andrade, Ana Silva
Education Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Psychometric Evidence for the Reading Screening Test–Digital Version in Portuguese Grade 1 Students

Ana Sucena, Cátia Marques, Eliana Andrade, Ana Silva
article en

Abstract

Early identification of reading difficulties may facilitate timely assessment, monitoring, and educational support. This study examined validity evidence for the Reading Screening Test–Digital Version (TRL-DV) among Grade 1 students in Portugal. A validation sample (N = 208) was used to examine internal structure, internal consistency, relations with external variables, and classification accuracy. An independent large psychometric sample (N = 2708) was used to examine internal structure, internal consistency, item functioning, precision, and item reach. The operational total score showed high internal consistency in both samples (KR-20 = 0.928 and 0.952), although these values may be inflated by common sequences of zero scores associated with unreached items. The correlated two-factor model outperformed the unidimensional model on several fit indices but did not yield a consistently admissible, adequately fitting solution. Scores correlated positively with word and pseudoword reading, rapid automatized naming, digit span, and teachers’ literacy grades. Item position and the decreasing probability of reaching later items contributed substantially to operational performance. An exploratory ROC analysis against a sample-derived criterion yielded AUC = 0.920. The findings support interpreting the total score as an indicator of decoding-related reading performance under timed digital administration and suggest potential screening value; component scores and classification thresholds require further validation.

Education SciencesVol. 16(11)
Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon