Assay dependence of concentration responses to Terminalia leaf and bark extracts in four food crops

Abstract Early-growth bioassays are widely used to screen tree–crop interactions, but their interpretation depends on exposure, endpoint and assay context. We analysed replicate records for leaf and bark extracts of Terminalia bellirica and Terminalia chebula applied to four food crops at 2, 5 and 10% mass per volume after 24, 48 or 72 h extraction. The dataset contained 864 treated records and 96 controls, with four complete outcomes. Contrasts among extract treatments avoided uncertain control sharing, while heterogeneous-variance intervals, multiplicity adjustment and exact single-record deletion assessed uncertainty and influence. Increasing concentration from 2 to 10% reduced laboratory root length by 46.14% for T. bellirica and 48.87% for T. chebula , compared with 3.24% and 15.94% in pots. Pot T. chebula germination declined by 11.39 percentage points on the nominal seed denominator while dry mass increased by 11.86%. Aggregate pot shoot-length increases did not survive multiplicity adjustment. Extending extraction from 24 to 72 h reduced pot germination by 6.00 and 6.89 percentage points, respectively. These results identify endpoint discordance and assay-dependent concentration responses rather than a universal crop-tolerance ranking. Laboratory and pot endpoints differed in age and medium, and inference remains conditional on the independence of the source replicate records. The analysis provides a reproducible basis for prioritising matched-exposure follow-up, without establishing chemical causation or field compatibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11264654/v1
Primary Topic
Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Assay dependence of concentration responses to Terminalia leaf and bark extracts in four food crops

Bhupendra Singh, Chatar Singh Dhanai, Ajaya Paliwal, Deepali Dobhal
Research Square
Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
preprint

Assay dependence of concentration responses to Terminalia leaf and bark extracts in four food crops

Bhupendra Singh, Chatar Singh Dhanai, Ajaya Paliwal, Deepali Dobhal
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Early-growth bioassays are widely used to screen tree–crop interactions, but their interpretation depends on exposure, endpoint and assay context. We analysed replicate records for leaf and bark extracts of Terminalia bellirica and Terminalia chebula applied to four food crops at 2, 5 and 10% mass per volume after 24, 48 or 72 h extraction. The dataset contained 864 treated records and 96 controls, with four complete outcomes. Contrasts among extract treatments avoided uncertain control sharing, while heterogeneous-variance intervals, multiplicity adjustment and exact single-record deletion assessed uncertainty and influence. Increasing concentration from 2 to 10% reduced laboratory root length by 46.14% for T. bellirica and 48.87% for T. chebula , compared with 3.24% and 15.94% in pots. Pot T. chebula germination declined by 11.39 percentage points on the nominal seed denominator while dry mass increased by 11.86%. Aggregate pot shoot-length increases did not survive multiplicity adjustment. Extending extraction from 24 to 72 h reduced pot germination by 6.00 and 6.89 percentage points, respectively. These results identify endpoint discordance and assay-dependent concentration responses rather than a universal crop-tolerance ranking. Laboratory and pot endpoints differed in age and medium, and inference remains conditional on the independence of the source replicate records. The analysis provides a reproducible basis for prioritising matched-exposure follow-up, without establishing chemical causation or field compatibility.

Research Square
Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture & Forestry (IN)
Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon