Why Breakthrough Drug Discovery Platforms Need Decades to Mature: Lessons from FBDD, DEL, Aptamers, and PROTACs

Abstract Breakthrough hit-finding platforms rarely become routine after the first novel proof-of-concept and realistically take 20−30 years to develop fully. Across FBDD, DEL, Aptamer, and PROTAC drug discovery technologies, the persistent rate-limiting issue in platform development is not the founding concept alone (e.g., chemistry) rather, it is often more likely due to organizations underestimating the time to develop a robust technique in-house and the significant supporting infrastructure and talent required to transform novel technologies into routine hit-finding drug discovery platforms. A consequence for not being “all in” on its development can be a dilution of effort across programs that may lead to fewer clinical candidates and a decrease in ROI. As a result, it can take decades not years to develop a platform. Using lessons learned from these four platforms, this Perspective identifies key (and often unappreciated) hurdles that each new technology needs to resolve before becoming a mainstream hit-finding drug discovery platform driving FDA approvals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6c02050
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Why Breakthrough Drug Discovery Platforms Need Decades to Mature: Lessons from FBDD, DEL, Aptamers, and PROTACs

William T. Windsor
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Why Breakthrough Drug Discovery Platforms Need Decades to Mature: Lessons from FBDD, DEL, Aptamers, and PROTACs

William T. Windsor
article en

Abstract

Abstract Breakthrough hit-finding platforms rarely become routine after the first novel proof-of-concept and realistically take 20−30 years to develop fully. Across FBDD, DEL, Aptamer, and PROTAC drug discovery technologies, the persistent rate-limiting issue in platform development is not the founding concept alone (e.g., chemistry) rather, it is often more likely due to organizations underestimating the time to develop a robust technique in-house and the significant supporting infrastructure and talent required to transform novel technologies into routine hit-finding drug discovery platforms. A consequence for not being “all in” on its development can be a dilution of effort across programs that may lead to fewer clinical candidates and a decrease in ROI. As a result, it can take decades not years to develop a platform. Using lessons learned from these four platforms, this Perspective identifies key (and often unappreciated) hurdles that each new technology needs to resolve before becoming a mainstream hit-finding drug discovery platform driving FDA approvals.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon