Young People’s Perceptions of Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control: The Role of Behavioural Frequency, Impact on the Victim and Participant Gender

As digital technologies have been increasingly integrated into everyday life, there has been accompanying evidence of their misuse by individuals engaging in coercive control. Although numerous studies have explored the prevalence of technology-facilitated coercive control (TFCC) in young people's relationships, comparatively little attention has been devoted to how these behaviours are perceived and interpreted. Employing a factorial survey design with 1,010 participants in Australia aged 16 to 25, this study investigated how individual and situational factors shape young people's perceptions of four hypothetical dating scenarios involving TFCC: (a) digital sexual coercion, (b) digital humiliation, (c) digital monitoring and (d) digital harassment and threats. Results indicate that behaviours were perceived as more harmful and less acceptable when they occurred frequently and had a negative impact on the victim. Adjusted associations between gender and perceptions emerged, with young men rating digital sexual coercion and humiliation as less harmful than young women and gender diverse participants. Open-ended responses revealed that young men often justified or minimised these behaviours. Qualitative data further highlighted the role of motive and meaning in shaping participants' interpretations of TFCC behaviours. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of contextual and individual factors in shaping perceptions of TFCC. Implications for TFCC measurement and prevention strategies are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261500446
Primary Topic
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Young People’s Perceptions of Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control: The Role of Behavioural Frequency, Impact on the Victim and Participant Gender

Silke Meyer, Jeffrey M. Ackerman, Molly Dragiewicz, María Atiénzar-Prieto et al.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
article

Young People’s Perceptions of Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control: The Role of Behavioural Frequency, Impact on the Victim and Participant Gender

Silke Meyer, Jeffrey M. Ackerman, Molly Dragiewicz, María Atiénzar-Prieto, Steven Baker
article en

Abstract

As digital technologies have been increasingly integrated into everyday life, there has been accompanying evidence of their misuse by individuals engaging in coercive control. Although numerous studies have explored the prevalence of technology-facilitated coercive control (TFCC) in young people's relationships, comparatively little attention has been devoted to how these behaviours are perceived and interpreted. Employing a factorial survey design with 1,010 participants in Australia aged 16 to 25, this study investigated how individual and situational factors shape young people's perceptions of four hypothetical dating scenarios involving TFCC: (a) digital sexual coercion, (b) digital humiliation, (c) digital monitoring and (d) digital harassment and threats. Results indicate that behaviours were perceived as more harmful and less acceptable when they occurred frequently and had a negative impact on the victim. Adjusted associations between gender and perceptions emerged, with young men rating digital sexual coercion and humiliation as less harmful than young women and gender diverse participants. Open-ended responses revealed that young men often justified or minimised these behaviours. Qualitative data further highlighted the role of motive and meaning in shaping participants' interpretations of TFCC behaviours. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of contextual and individual factors in shaping perceptions of TFCC. Implications for TFCC measurement and prevention strategies are discussed.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Griffith University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon