The Contraction Budget for the Horizon Problem: E-Folds of Contraction Required in Matter and Stiff Bounces Compared

A matter-like contraction must run for 128.9 e-folds of scale-factor decrease to shrink the comoving Hubble radius by the target factor of 10^28, during which the density grows by a factor of ten to the power 168.0. A radiation-like contraction needs 64.5 e-folds. A stiff contraction needs only 32.2 e-folds, with a density growth of ten to the power 84.0. The stiff budget is smaller in e-folds by the ratio of the shrink rates, a factor of two against matter in the exponent per e-fold, and the advantage compounds in the density growth because the stiff fluid's density also climbs faster per e-fold. Even the cheapest budget, however, demands a contraction lasting tens of e-folds: there is no version of this solution in which a brief contracting episode suffices. The study is a computation from stated assumptions, performed by the accompanying script; it is simulated, not measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24123404
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Contraction Budget for the Horizon Problem: E-Folds of Contraction Required in Matter and Stiff Bounces Compared

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

The Contraction Budget for the Horizon Problem: E-Folds of Contraction Required in Matter and Stiff Bounces Compared

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A matter-like contraction must run for 128.9 e-folds of scale-factor decrease to shrink the comoving Hubble radius by the target factor of 10^28, during which the density grows by a factor of ten to the power 168.0. A radiation-like contraction needs 64.5 e-folds. A stiff contraction needs only 32.2 e-folds, with a density growth of ten to the power 84.0. The stiff budget is smaller in e-folds by the ratio of the shrink rates, a factor of two against matter in the exponent per e-fold, and the advantage compounds in the density growth because the stiff fluid's density also climbs faster per e-fold. Even the cheapest budget, however, demands a contraction lasting tens of e-folds: there is no version of this solution in which a brief contracting episode suffices. The study is a computation from stated assumptions, performed by the accompanying script; it is simulated, not measured.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon