Rotary Burnishing of Internal Tube Surfaces with a Preloaded Compliant Crown: A Force–Geometry–Compliance Model and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis

A reduced model of internal rotary burnishing couples Hertz–expanding-cavity indentation, Euler–Bernoulli crown bending and loading-chain compression through incremental equilibrium from preload. The resulting residual geometry supplies an in-service contact model. In the reference numerical case with a steel crown and an Al–Cu–Mg tube, 20 μm of additional travel from a 20 N preload gives a total force of 408 N, a maximum penetration of 14.1 μm and an edge-to-centre residual sag of 2.70 μm. Indentation, crown bending and loading-chain compression account for 60.9%, 19.7% and 19.4% of this travel, respectively. The two process-derived cells have texture area fractions of 0.03–0.04 and specific cavity volumes of 0.05–0.07 μm. In a separate 1×1 mm periodic-contact benchmark at 5 MPa, the directly integrated rough-land approach is 1.07 μm, compared with a smooth-contact rigid-plane offset of 2.85 nm. Global sensitivity identifies yield strength as the leading input for residual sag (total-order Sobol index STi=0.57); total-force sensitivity is greatest for preload, followed by crown thickness. With the Hertz–expanding-cavity transition markers fixed, the prescribed calibration-uncertainty distributions give Monte Carlo 5th–95th percentile intervals of 2.2–3.3 μm for residual sag and 387–426 N for total force. Variance reductions obtained by fixing individual inputs in this calibration scenario identify yield strength as the main calibration priority for residual geometry, and loading-chain stiffness and local crown thickness as priorities for force transfer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10110499
Primary Topic
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Rotary Burnishing of Internal Tube Surfaces with a Preloaded Compliant Crown: A Force–Geometry–Compliance Model and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis

Ivan S. Nekrasov, Elena V. Tsygankova, Alexander V. Zagulyaev, Kirill Aleksandrovich Bashmur et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
article

Rotary Burnishing of Internal Tube Surfaces with a Preloaded Compliant Crown: A Force–Geometry–Compliance Model and Parametric Sensitivity Analysis

Ivan S. Nekrasov, Elena V. Tsygankova, Alexander V. Zagulyaev, Kirill Aleksandrovich Bashmur, Tatiana N. Sviridova
article en

Abstract

A reduced model of internal rotary burnishing couples Hertz–expanding-cavity indentation, Euler–Bernoulli crown bending and loading-chain compression through incremental equilibrium from preload. The resulting residual geometry supplies an in-service contact model. In the reference numerical case with a steel crown and an Al–Cu–Mg tube, 20 μm of additional travel from a 20 N preload gives a total force of 408 N, a maximum penetration of 14.1 μm and an edge-to-centre residual sag of 2.70 μm. Indentation, crown bending and loading-chain compression account for 60.9%, 19.7% and 19.4% of this travel, respectively. The two process-derived cells have texture area fractions of 0.03–0.04 and specific cavity volumes of 0.05–0.07 μm. In a separate 1×1 mm periodic-contact benchmark at 5 MPa, the directly integrated rough-land approach is 1.07 μm, compared with a smooth-contact rigid-plane offset of 2.85 nm. Global sensitivity identifies yield strength as the leading input for residual sag (total-order Sobol index STi=0.57); total-force sensitivity is greatest for preload, followed by crown thickness. With the Hertz–expanding-cavity transition markers fixed, the prescribed calibration-uncertainty distributions give Monte Carlo 5th–95th percentile intervals of 2.2–3.3 μm for residual sag and 387–426 N for total force. Variance reductions obtained by fixing individual inputs in this calibration scenario identify yield strength as the main calibration priority for residual geometry, and loading-chain stiffness and local crown thickness as priorities for force transfer.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(11)
Siberian Federal University (RU)
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon