Parent-only and parent–adolescent delivery of the Unified Protocol for adolescent emotional disorders: a preference-based non-randomised controlled study

Abstract Introduction: The Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) is a transdiagnostic treatment for adolescent emotional disorders, but its delivery typically requires direct adolescent participation, which may limit access for some families. We aimed to examine outcomes of parent-only UP-A (P-O) compared with treatment as usual (TAU), and to assess whether parent–adolescent UP-A (P-A) retained a clinical signal when selected in routine care. Method This assessor-masked, preference-based nonrandomised study enrolled 99 adolescents aged 12–17 years with emotional disorders who selected P-O, P-A, or TAU (33 per arm). Both active formats comprised 12 weekly group sessions using a culturally adapted UP-A. The primary outcome was posttreatment Clinical Global Impressions–Severity (CGI-S). Secondary outcomes included response, remission, and measures of symptoms, functioning, emotion regulation, and family processes. Analyses used augmented inverse-probability weighting and mixed-effects models with false-discovery-rate adjustment. Results At posttreatment, P-O was associated with lower CGI-S than TAU (adjusted mean difference, − 1.04; 95% CI, − 1.82 to − 0.42; p=.003), with the difference maintained at 3-month follow-up (− 1.18; 95% CI, − 1.96 to − 0.47; p=.002). P-A was also associated with lower CGI-S than TAU at posttreatment (− 0.58; 95% CI, − 1.13 to − 0.07; p=.027) and follow-up (− 1.02; 95% CI, − 1.61 to − 0.36; p=.001). Global functioning showed the most consistent secondary-domain differences. Direct P-O–P-A endpoint comparisons were nonsignificant. Conclusion Both active formats were associated with clinically meaningful improvement. Parent-only UP-A may provide an alternative when direct adolescent participation is not feasible, although randomised head-to-head trials are needed. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500097313 registered 17 February 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10927486/v1
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Parent-only and parent–adolescent delivery of the Unified Protocol for adolescent emotional disorders: a preference-based non-randomised controlled study

Qiujin Qian, Shiyao Wu, Yili Wang, Meirong Pan et al.
Research Square
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
preprint

Parent-only and parent–adolescent delivery of the Unified Protocol for adolescent emotional disorders: a preference-based non-randomised controlled study

Qiujin Qian, Shiyao Wu, Yili Wang, Meirong Pan, LI Haimei, Yufeng Wang, Xue GAO, Lu Liu, Biying Ye, Yongbai Zhang, ZhongFang Fu
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) is a transdiagnostic treatment for adolescent emotional disorders, but its delivery typically requires direct adolescent participation, which may limit access for some families. We aimed to examine outcomes of parent-only UP-A (P-O) compared with treatment as usual (TAU), and to assess whether parent–adolescent UP-A (P-A) retained a clinical signal when selected in routine care. Method This assessor-masked, preference-based nonrandomised study enrolled 99 adolescents aged 12–17 years with emotional disorders who selected P-O, P-A, or TAU (33 per arm). Both active formats comprised 12 weekly group sessions using a culturally adapted UP-A. The primary outcome was posttreatment Clinical Global Impressions–Severity (CGI-S). Secondary outcomes included response, remission, and measures of symptoms, functioning, emotion regulation, and family processes. Analyses used augmented inverse-probability weighting and mixed-effects models with false-discovery-rate adjustment. Results At posttreatment, P-O was associated with lower CGI-S than TAU (adjusted mean difference, − 1.04; 95% CI, − 1.82 to − 0.42; p=.003), with the difference maintained at 3-month follow-up (− 1.18; 95% CI, − 1.96 to − 0.47; p=.002). P-A was also associated with lower CGI-S than TAU at posttreatment (− 0.58; 95% CI, − 1.13 to − 0.07; p=.027) and follow-up (− 1.02; 95% CI, − 1.61 to − 0.36; p=.001). Global functioning showed the most consistent secondary-domain differences. Direct P-O–P-A endpoint comparisons were nonsignificant. Conclusion Both active formats were associated with clinically meaningful improvement. Parent-only UP-A may provide an alternative when direct adolescent participation is not feasible, although randomised head-to-head trials are needed. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500097313 registered 17 February 2025.

Research Square
Peking University (CN), Peking University Sixth Hospital (CN)
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon