Validation of Friedewald, Martin, Sampson and Modified Sampson Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Pediatric Population

Background: Accurate estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is essential for cardiovascular risk assessment in pediatric populations, yet the comparative performance of available estimation equations remains insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the agreement, systematic bias, and diagnostic performance of the Friedewald, Martin, original Sampson, and Modified Sampson equations for estimating LDL-C and derived low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL/HDL-C) and triglyceride-to-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/LDL-C) ratios. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional agreement study was conducted among 500 pediatric patients. Agreement with laboratory measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), percentage bias, Bland–Altman analysis, Passing–Bablok regression, and diagnostic accuracy at an LDL-C cut-off of 110 mg/dL. Results: The Modified Sampson equation demonstrated the best overall analytical performance for LDL-C estimation (ICC = 0.931; CCC = 0.930; RMSE = 8.62 mg/dL; MAE = 6.73 mg/dL; bias = −0.805%) and showed no proportional bias. It also provided the highest agreement for LDL/HDL-C (ICC = CCC = 0.962) and TG/LDL-C ratios (ICC = CCC = 0.965), with the lowest estimation errors. The Martin and original Sampson equations showed intermediate performance, whereas the Friedewald equation consistently demonstrated the lowest agreement and greatest systematic bias. All equations showed excellent diagnostic accuracy; the Martin equation achieved the highest accuracy (94.40%), specificity (97.86%), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.980), while Modified Sampson showed the highest sensitivity (78.75%). Conclusions: Overall, the Modified Sampson equation provided the closest analytical agreement with laboratory LDL-C and derived ratios, whereas the Martin equation showed the strongest classification performance. These findings support the use of newer LDL-C estimation equations over the Friedewald equation in pediatric populations for improved lipid assessment and cardiovascular risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13111561
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Validation of Friedewald, Martin, Sampson and Modified Sampson Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Pediatric Population

Rodrigo Romero‐Nava, Cruz Vargas‐De‐León, Francisco Javier Tepepa-López, Erika Gómez-Zamora et al.
Children
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Validation of Friedewald, Martin, Sampson and Modified Sampson Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Pediatric Population

Rodrigo Romero‐Nava, Cruz Vargas‐De‐León, Francisco Javier Tepepa-López, Erika Gómez-Zamora, Gabriela Ibáñez-Cervantes, María Esther Ocharan-Hernández, Roberto Rivera-Sánchez, Estibeyesbo Said Plascencia-Nieto, Adriana Flores-Miranda, Celeste Eunice Tizapantzi-Pastrana, Sandy Areli Escobar-Alarcon, Fermin Acosta-Magallanes
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is essential for cardiovascular risk assessment in pediatric populations, yet the comparative performance of available estimation equations remains insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the agreement, systematic bias, and diagnostic performance of the Friedewald, Martin, original Sampson, and Modified Sampson equations for estimating LDL-C and derived low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL/HDL-C) and triglyceride-to-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/LDL-C) ratios. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional agreement study was conducted among 500 pediatric patients. Agreement with laboratory measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), percentage bias, Bland–Altman analysis, Passing–Bablok regression, and diagnostic accuracy at an LDL-C cut-off of 110 mg/dL. Results: The Modified Sampson equation demonstrated the best overall analytical performance for LDL-C estimation (ICC = 0.931; CCC = 0.930; RMSE = 8.62 mg/dL; MAE = 6.73 mg/dL; bias = −0.805%) and showed no proportional bias. It also provided the highest agreement for LDL/HDL-C (ICC = CCC = 0.962) and TG/LDL-C ratios (ICC = CCC = 0.965), with the lowest estimation errors. The Martin and original Sampson equations showed intermediate performance, whereas the Friedewald equation consistently demonstrated the lowest agreement and greatest systematic bias. All equations showed excellent diagnostic accuracy; the Martin equation achieved the highest accuracy (94.40%), specificity (97.86%), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.980), while Modified Sampson showed the highest sensitivity (78.75%). Conclusions: Overall, the Modified Sampson equation provided the closest analytical agreement with laboratory LDL-C and derived ratios, whereas the Martin equation showed the strongest classification performance. These findings support the use of newer LDL-C estimation equations over the Friedewald equation in pediatric populations for improved lipid assessment and cardiovascular risk stratification.

ChildrenVol. 13(11)
Hospital Juárez de México (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon