Three steps forward, one step back: The Draft National Health Research Policy 2026

The Draft National Health Research Policy (NHRP), 2026, marks significant progress in re-organising India’s fragmented health research ecosystem. This commentary first commends four features that respond to existing gaps in the research ecosystem — its interdisciplinary approach, built-in transparency provisions, revision of the research assessment framework, and the requirement of informed consent for computational data use. The commentary then recommends improving the policy by increasing participation of the states, naming bodies responsible for listed functions, strengthening benefit-sharing provisions, and anchoring consent procedures within the framework of supported decision-making. Lastly, two areas require further deliberation: revising the research domains to better reflect the envisaged research priorities, and explicitly recognising persons with disabilities both as researchers and research participants. The momentum set by the Draft NHRP must be sustained by timely finalisation of the Policy after accommodating public comments, and early establishment of the named bodies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2026.067
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Three steps forward, one step back: The Draft National Health Research Policy 2026

Shivani Mody, Dhvani D. Mehta, Rituparna Padhy
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Three steps forward, one step back: The Draft National Health Research Policy 2026

Shivani Mody, Dhvani D. Mehta, Rituparna Padhy
article en

Abstract

The Draft National Health Research Policy (NHRP), 2026, marks significant progress in re-organising India’s fragmented health research ecosystem. This commentary first commends four features that respond to existing gaps in the research ecosystem — its interdisciplinary approach, built-in transparency provisions, revision of the research assessment framework, and the requirement of informed consent for computational data use. The commentary then recommends improving the policy by increasing participation of the states, naming bodies responsible for listed functions, strengthening benefit-sharing provisions, and anchoring consent procedures within the framework of supported decision-making. Lastly, two areas require further deliberation: revising the research domains to better reflect the envisaged research priorities, and explicitly recognising persons with disabilities both as researchers and research participants. The momentum set by the Draft NHRP must be sustained by timely finalisation of the Policy after accommodating public comments, and early establishment of the named bodies.

Indian Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 11(4)
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon