Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Endometrial Cancer: Does Robotic Surgery Attenuate the Early Systemic Inflammatory Response?

Background/Objectives: Robotic and laparoscopic staging for endometrial cancer (EC) yield comparable oncologic outcomes, but whether robotic surgery attenuates the early systemic inflammatory response is unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study at a European Society of Gynaecological Oncology-accredited center included 110 consecutive women (49 laparoscopic, 61 robotic) with apparently uterine-confined, non-aggressive EC who underwent sentinel lymph node-based staging by the same surgeons within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Complete blood counts were obtained in routine care preoperatively and 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were measured routinely at 48 h but only selectively at intermediate time points, and albumin only preoperatively and at 48 h. The trajectories of five blood count-derived indices (systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], systemic inflammation response index, and neutrophil-, platelet-, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios) were compared with mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline imbalances. Results: All five indices reached their highest observed values at 6 h and declined by 48 h, with no detectable between-group difference in trajectory (group × time p = 0.54–0.85; 6-h SII ratio, robotic/laparoscopic, 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.71–1.23). Robotic surgery took longer (median 180 vs. 155 min; p = 0.012) and was followed by a greater 6-h hemoglobin decline (0.93 vs. 0.55 g/dL; p = 0.020) but a similar hemoglobin trajectory (p = 0.17). Complications, length of stay, and 30-day readmission did not differ detectably, although vaginal cuff complications were more frequent after robotic surgery (7/61 vs. 1/49). Conclusions: Early inflammatory trajectories did not differ detectably between robotic and laparoscopic staging, although moderate differences cannot be excluded. Sampling time for these indices should be standardized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15228815
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Endometrial Cancer: Does Robotic Surgery Attenuate the Early Systemic Inflammatory Response?

Ali Selçuk Yeniocak, Yücel Kaya, Neçirvan Çağdaş Çaltek, İlkbal Temel Yüksel et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Endometrial Cancer: Does Robotic Surgery Attenuate the Early Systemic Inflammatory Response?

Ali Selçuk Yeniocak, Yücel Kaya, Neçirvan Çağdaş Çaltek, İlkbal Temel Yüksel, Emrah Dağdeviren, Can Tercan, Ali Konu, Metehan Uzundal, İlteriş Yaman
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robotic and laparoscopic staging for endometrial cancer (EC) yield comparable oncologic outcomes, but whether robotic surgery attenuates the early systemic inflammatory response is unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study at a European Society of Gynaecological Oncology-accredited center included 110 consecutive women (49 laparoscopic, 61 robotic) with apparently uterine-confined, non-aggressive EC who underwent sentinel lymph node-based staging by the same surgeons within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Complete blood counts were obtained in routine care preoperatively and 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were measured routinely at 48 h but only selectively at intermediate time points, and albumin only preoperatively and at 48 h. The trajectories of five blood count-derived indices (systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], systemic inflammation response index, and neutrophil-, platelet-, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios) were compared with mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline imbalances. Results: All five indices reached their highest observed values at 6 h and declined by 48 h, with no detectable between-group difference in trajectory (group × time p = 0.54–0.85; 6-h SII ratio, robotic/laparoscopic, 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.71–1.23). Robotic surgery took longer (median 180 vs. 155 min; p = 0.012) and was followed by a greater 6-h hemoglobin decline (0.93 vs. 0.55 g/dL; p = 0.020) but a similar hemoglobin trajectory (p = 0.17). Complications, length of stay, and 30-day readmission did not differ detectably, although vaginal cuff complications were more frequent after robotic surgery (7/61 vs. 1/49). Conclusions: Early inflammatory trajectories did not differ detectably between robotic and laparoscopic staging, although moderate differences cannot be excluded. Sampling time for these indices should be standardized.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(22)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi (TR)
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon