Using Rock Dust from Asphalt Plants as a Supplementary Cementitious Material in Concrete

Abstract Asphalt-plant rock dust (RD) is a fine by-product generated during hot mix asphalt production and is often landfilled or ponded, although it has potential for beneficial use in concrete. This study evaluates RD generated at hot mix asphalt plants as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete and examines how source mineralogy and fineness affect pozzolanic reactivity, alkali-silica reaction (ASR) mitigation, and concrete performance. Nine RD samples in their as-received state were characterized and screened using physical, chemical, and reactivity tests, followed by mortar and concrete evaluation of selected materials. Pozzolanic reactivity varied widely among the tested RDs. Based on rapid, relevant, and reproducible ( R 3 ) heat release and calcium hydroxide consumption, four samples were classified as moderately pozzolanic, while the others behaved primarily as inert fillers. The moderately pozzolanic samples also showed strength activity index values above 80% and provided greater ASR mitigation, with expansion reductions of up to 61% at 20% replacement and 71%–87% at 30% and 35% replacement levels. Concrete mixtures with selected RDs at 20% cement replacement showed improved workability but reduced 90-day compressive strength by 24%–35% relative to the control. Bulk electrical resistivity at 90 days remained comparable to the control, while drying shrinkage was controlled with the aid of a shrinkage-reducing admixture. Among the tested materials, DI-1 and QM-3 showed the greatest promise for structural concrete applications, whereas DI-3 and QM-1 appear better suited for lower-strength applications. Overall, based on the nine tested RD samples in this study, RD suitability as an SCM depends strongly on source characteristics and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, providing new guidance for screening asphalt-plant RD sources and supporting their potential use as regional SCMs in more sustainable concrete production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-24742
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Using Rock Dust from Asphalt Plants as a Supplementary Cementitious Material in Concrete

Michael H. Gardner, Kirolos Kelada, Somayeh Nassiri, Ali Reza Zarei
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Using Rock Dust from Asphalt Plants as a Supplementary Cementitious Material in Concrete

Michael H. Gardner, Kirolos Kelada, Somayeh Nassiri, Ali Reza Zarei
article en

Abstract

Abstract Asphalt-plant rock dust (RD) is a fine by-product generated during hot mix asphalt production and is often landfilled or ponded, although it has potential for beneficial use in concrete. This study evaluates RD generated at hot mix asphalt plants as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete and examines how source mineralogy and fineness affect pozzolanic reactivity, alkali-silica reaction (ASR) mitigation, and concrete performance. Nine RD samples in their as-received state were characterized and screened using physical, chemical, and reactivity tests, followed by mortar and concrete evaluation of selected materials. Pozzolanic reactivity varied widely among the tested RDs. Based on rapid, relevant, and reproducible ( R 3 ) heat release and calcium hydroxide consumption, four samples were classified as moderately pozzolanic, while the others behaved primarily as inert fillers. The moderately pozzolanic samples also showed strength activity index values above 80% and provided greater ASR mitigation, with expansion reductions of up to 61% at 20% replacement and 71%–87% at 30% and 35% replacement levels. Concrete mixtures with selected RDs at 20% cement replacement showed improved workability but reduced 90-day compressive strength by 24%–35% relative to the control. Bulk electrical resistivity at 90 days remained comparable to the control, while drying shrinkage was controlled with the aid of a shrinkage-reducing admixture. Among the tested materials, DI-1 and QM-3 showed the greatest promise for structural concrete applications, whereas DI-3 and QM-1 appear better suited for lower-strength applications. Overall, based on the nine tested RD samples in this study, RD suitability as an SCM depends strongly on source characteristics and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, providing new guidance for screening asphalt-plant RD sources and supporting their potential use as regional SCMs in more sustainable concrete production.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 39(3)
California Department of Transportation (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon