Phenotype-driven use of vasopressin in distributive shock: results of a national consensus
Distributive shock is a major cause of haemodynamic instability in critically ill and perioperative patients. Despite norepinephrine being the recommended primary treatment, its adverse effects, which are dose-dependent and include arrhythmias and myocardial ischaemia, along with catecholamine resistance, support the consideration of additional non-adrenergic approaches. Growing evidence suggests that vasopressin can restore vascular tone through non-adrenergic pathways, reduce catecholamine exposure, and potentially enhance organ function, although uncertainties remain regarding optimal timing, patient selection, and practical implementation. This Italian national consensus aimed to provide phenotype-driven, bedside-applicable guidance on the practical use of vasopressin in vasodilatory shock, with an emphasis on haemodynamic stabilisation, catecholamine sparing, and organ protection. Using a modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, a multidisciplinary panel of intensivists and anaesthesiologists evaluated six clinical phenotypes: overwhelming septic shock, septic shock with tachycardia/tachyarrhythmia, septic shock with acute kidney injury, post-cardiac surgery refractory vasoplegia, persistent post-reperfusion shock during liver transplantation, and shock in severe ARDS with right ventricular dysfunction. Each scenario was explored using real-world composite vignettes to enhance bedside applicability. Across phenotypes, early adjunctive low-dose vasopressin was rated as appropriate, often at norepinephrine base doses of approximately 0.2 μg/kg/min, and as early as 0.1–0.2 μg/kg/min when tachyarrhythmia risk is prominent. In post-cardiac surgery refractory vasoplegia, vasopressin was rated as appropriate to restore vascular tone and reduce catecholamine toxicity, whereas the strategy of tapering vasopressin before norepinephrine was uncertain due to disagreement. Vasopressin was also rated as first-line support in severe ARDS to maintain vascular tone without increasing pulmonary vascular resistance. The consensus integrates evidence suggesting catecholamine-sparing effects, lower atrial fibrillation risk, and possible reductions in renal replacement therapy, while highlighting safety considerations and key evidence gaps regarding the optimal triggers, phenotype-specific effects, and long-term outcomes. This study offers practical guidance for integrating vasopressin into a customised vasopressor strategy and outlines the priorities for future research in precision haemodynamic management.
Authors
- Alberto Corona (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-3278)
- Daniela Pasero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-7562)
- Irene Coloretti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9022-1768)
- Ettore Panascia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6506-5360)
- Federica Morselli
- Francesco Forfori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-8076)
- Gennaro De Pascale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-0676)
- Sabino Scolletta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-2052)
- Sergio Cattaneo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-508X)
- Katia Donadello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-8434)
- Giacomo Monti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-9238)
- Gianluca Paternoster (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-0821)
- Fabio Guarracino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2562-0199)
- Giacomo Grasselli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-1400)
- Massimo Girardis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2453-0829)
- Luigi Tritapepe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-1705)
- Maurizio Cecconi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4376-6538)
- Abele Donati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6792-8741)
- Salvatore Grasso (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0287-0232)
- Giovanna Panarello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-0644)
- Valentina Ajello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6254-3254)
- Elena Bignami
Institutions
- University of Pisa (IT)
- University of Verona (IT)
- University of Parma (IT)
- University of Sassari (IT)
- University of Basilicata (IT)
- Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini (IT)
- Ospedale San Carlo (IT)
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT)
- Policlinico Universitario di Catania (IT)
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese (IT)
- Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" (IT)
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT)
- Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale della Valcamonica (IT)
- Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
- Published
- 2026-11-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00472-x
- Primary Topic
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00