Bell Visibility over Astronomical Baselines: How Much Fundamental Decoherence a Loophole-Free Test Can Tolerate

This paper calculates the visibility threshold for a Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt violation and converts it into the largest fundamental decoherence rate compatible with a violation over astronomical baselines. Violation requires visibility above 0.7071. Over a million-light-year baseline the decoherence rate must lie below 1.098e-14 per second; over a billion-light-year baseline below 1.098e-17 per second. These are demanding but purely kinematic tolerances: any observed violation at such baselines would bound decoherence at these levels, while a null result could not distinguish fundamental decoherence from ordinary loss without a full noise budget. The study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24145205
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Bell Visibility over Astronomical Baselines: How Much Fundamental Decoherence a Loophole-Free Test Can Tolerate

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

Bell Visibility over Astronomical Baselines: How Much Fundamental Decoherence a Loophole-Free Test Can Tolerate

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

This paper calculates the visibility threshold for a Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt violation and converts it into the largest fundamental decoherence rate compatible with a violation over astronomical baselines. Violation requires visibility above 0.7071. Over a million-light-year baseline the decoherence rate must lie below 1.098e-14 per second; over a billion-light-year baseline below 1.098e-17 per second. These are demanding but purely kinematic tolerances: any observed violation at such baselines would bound decoherence at these levels, while a null result could not distinguish fundamental decoherence from ordinary loss without a full noise budget. The study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon