Dentists’ Knowledge, Antibiotic Prescribing Practices, and Guideline Adherence for Pediatric Patients in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background/Objectives: Odontogenic infections are common in children, and dentists account for a considerable proportion of antibiotic prescriptions. Inappropriate prescribing contributes to antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of dentists in Türkiye regarding antibiotic prescribing for pediatric patients and their adherence to current guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between July and November 2022 among general dentists and dental specialists practicing in Türkiye. The questionnaire comprised demographic characteristics, prescribing attitudes and behaviors, and four clinical case scenarios. A 17-item knowledge score was calculated, and group differences were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 400 dentists participated, with a mean knowledge score of 11.63 ± 2.79. Based on the original scoring key, the proportions of participants providing concordant responses to all scored items in Cases 1–3 were 31.75%, 57.5%, and 57.25%, respectively. In the scenario requiring antibiotic selection, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid was the most frequently selected first-line antibiotic (72.25%), while azithromycin was the most frequently selected alternative for patients with penicillin allergy (45.75%). In Case 4, 84% of respondents selected facial cellulitis as an indication for antibiotic treatment. In unadjusted comparisons, knowledge scores were higher among women, dentists with 1–5 years of professional experience, specialists (particularly pediatric dentists), and those treating more than five pediatric patients daily. Self-reported weight-based dosing, questioning recent antibiotic use, informing parents about medication adherence, and familiarity with the term “antibiotic resistance” were also associated with higher knowledge scores. Conclusions: Responses to hypothetical clinical scenarios revealed variations in dentists’ knowledge and decision-making regarding antibiotic prescribing for pediatric patients, with inconsistent concordance with guideline recommendations. The original scoring criteria and vignettes present inherent clinical limitations when interpreting knowledge scores, as hypothetical scenarios cannot fully capture complex in-person diagnostic decisions. These findings highlight potential areas for improvement in guideline-based decision-making and support the need for targeted undergraduate and continuing professional education on rational antibiotic use. Further research evaluating actual prescribing practices is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14223862
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Dentists’ Knowledge, Antibiotic Prescribing Practices, and Guideline Adherence for Pediatric Patients in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Survey

İsmet Rezani Toptancı, Fatma Budak
Healthcare
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Dentists’ Knowledge, Antibiotic Prescribing Practices, and Guideline Adherence for Pediatric Patients in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Survey

İsmet Rezani Toptancı, Fatma Budak
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Odontogenic infections are common in children, and dentists account for a considerable proportion of antibiotic prescriptions. Inappropriate prescribing contributes to antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of dentists in Türkiye regarding antibiotic prescribing for pediatric patients and their adherence to current guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between July and November 2022 among general dentists and dental specialists practicing in Türkiye. The questionnaire comprised demographic characteristics, prescribing attitudes and behaviors, and four clinical case scenarios. A 17-item knowledge score was calculated, and group differences were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 400 dentists participated, with a mean knowledge score of 11.63 ± 2.79. Based on the original scoring key, the proportions of participants providing concordant responses to all scored items in Cases 1–3 were 31.75%, 57.5%, and 57.25%, respectively. In the scenario requiring antibiotic selection, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid was the most frequently selected first-line antibiotic (72.25%), while azithromycin was the most frequently selected alternative for patients with penicillin allergy (45.75%). In Case 4, 84% of respondents selected facial cellulitis as an indication for antibiotic treatment. In unadjusted comparisons, knowledge scores were higher among women, dentists with 1–5 years of professional experience, specialists (particularly pediatric dentists), and those treating more than five pediatric patients daily. Self-reported weight-based dosing, questioning recent antibiotic use, informing parents about medication adherence, and familiarity with the term “antibiotic resistance” were also associated with higher knowledge scores. Conclusions: Responses to hypothetical clinical scenarios revealed variations in dentists’ knowledge and decision-making regarding antibiotic prescribing for pediatric patients, with inconsistent concordance with guideline recommendations. The original scoring criteria and vignettes present inherent clinical limitations when interpreting knowledge scores, as hypothetical scenarios cannot fully capture complex in-person diagnostic decisions. These findings highlight potential areas for improvement in guideline-based decision-making and support the need for targeted undergraduate and continuing professional education on rational antibiotic use. Further research evaluating actual prescribing practices is warranted.

HealthcareVol. 14(22)
Dicle University (TR)
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon