Malachy Postlethwayt on slave trade and the prospects of the British Empire in Africa

Malachy Postlethwayt, former director and propagandist of the Royal African Company, was an authority on commercial matters among Anglo-American abolitionists. The author’s unique journey would be appealing to the antislavery cause. In less than a decade, Postlethwayt shifted from offering an apologetic defense of the transatlantic slave trade to arguing that it could hinder the development of a civilized, humane, and profitable commerce in African commodities and staple crops. Over the next decades, the author became the recognized source for an important argument for abolition: the commodity trade with African territories could be at least as profitable as the slave trade. This article reappraises the historical context of Postlethwayt’s publications in the 1740s and early 1750s to demonstrate how the argument for a legitimate commerce with Africa arose amid mid-eighteenth-century debates about the fate of the Royal African Company.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4eapy
Primary Topic
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Malachy Postlethwayt on slave trade and the prospects of the British Empire in Africa

Ana Paula Londe Silva
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
preprint

Malachy Postlethwayt on slave trade and the prospects of the British Empire in Africa

Ana Paula Londe Silva
preprint en

Abstract

Malachy Postlethwayt, former director and propagandist of the Royal African Company, was an authority on commercial matters among Anglo-American abolitionists. The author’s unique journey would be appealing to the antislavery cause. In less than a decade, Postlethwayt shifted from offering an apologetic defense of the transatlantic slave trade to arguing that it could hinder the development of a civilized, humane, and profitable commerce in African commodities and staple crops. Over the next decades, the author became the recognized source for an important argument for abolition: the commodity trade with African territories could be at least as profitable as the slave trade. This article reappraises the historical context of Postlethwayt’s publications in the 1740s and early 1750s to demonstrate how the argument for a legitimate commerce with Africa arose amid mid-eighteenth-century debates about the fate of the Royal African Company.

SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon