Atypical Intraductal Proliferation in Patients With Grade Group 1-2 or No Invasive Cancer on Prostate Biopsy: An Institutional Experience

Objectives Atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) is an intraductal proliferation in which histologic features are more atypical than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia but fall short of diagnostic criteria of intraductal carcinoma. We performed a retrospective review of patients with AIP and low-grade or no invasive cancer and correlated with follow-up and Decipher scores. Methods Prostate biopsies from 2016 to 2022 with AIP and no invasive carcinoma, Grade Group 1 (GG1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) prostatic adenocarcinoma, or Grade Group 2 (GG2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7) prostatic adenocarcinoma were identified. Patients with concomitant intraductal carcinoma and/or ≥ GG3 were excluded. Decipher testing, PTEN staining, and subsequent biopsy/prostatectomy data were obtained from the medical record. Adverse features at prostatectomy were defined as ≥GG3, ≥pT3a, pN1, intraductal carcinoma, or Gleason pattern 5. Results There were 51 biopsies with AIP and no invasive cancer ( n = 5), GG1 ( n = 10), or GG2 ( n = 36) from 2016 to 2022. Of 18 patients who underwent subsequent biopsy, 6 (33%) had increase in Grade Group. Of 14 patients who underwent prostatectomy, 10 (71%) showed at least one adverse feature at prostatectomy. Twelve patients (10 GG2, 2 GG1) had Decipher testing. The median Decipher for the 10 GG2 biopsies was 0.53, corresponding to intermediate Decipher risk. The median Decipher for the 2 GG1 biopsies was 0.40, corresponding to low Decipher risk. Conclusions AIP in the absence of other high-risk features at biopsy may be a harbinger of subsequent adverse pathology on follow-up. AIP is an entity that may require more frequent active surveillance in the absence of other high-risk features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969261493464
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Atypical Intraductal Proliferation in Patients With Grade Group 1-2 or No Invasive Cancer on Prostate Biopsy: An Institutional Experience

Nancy Greenland, Chien‐Kuang Cornelia Ding, Bradley A. Stohr, Emily Chan et al.
International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Atypical Intraductal Proliferation in Patients With Grade Group 1-2 or No Invasive Cancer on Prostate Biopsy: An Institutional Experience

Nancy Greenland, Chien‐Kuang Cornelia Ding, Bradley A. Stohr, Emily Chan, Deepika Sirohi, Janet E. Cowan, Peter R. Carroll, Garrett J. Chan, Matthew R. Cooperberg
article en

Abstract

Objectives Atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) is an intraductal proliferation in which histologic features are more atypical than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia but fall short of diagnostic criteria of intraductal carcinoma. We performed a retrospective review of patients with AIP and low-grade or no invasive cancer and correlated with follow-up and Decipher scores. Methods Prostate biopsies from 2016 to 2022 with AIP and no invasive carcinoma, Grade Group 1 (GG1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) prostatic adenocarcinoma, or Grade Group 2 (GG2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7) prostatic adenocarcinoma were identified. Patients with concomitant intraductal carcinoma and/or ≥ GG3 were excluded. Decipher testing, PTEN staining, and subsequent biopsy/prostatectomy data were obtained from the medical record. Adverse features at prostatectomy were defined as ≥GG3, ≥pT3a, pN1, intraductal carcinoma, or Gleason pattern 5. Results There were 51 biopsies with AIP and no invasive cancer ( n = 5), GG1 ( n = 10), or GG2 ( n = 36) from 2016 to 2022. Of 18 patients who underwent subsequent biopsy, 6 (33%) had increase in Grade Group. Of 14 patients who underwent prostatectomy, 10 (71%) showed at least one adverse feature at prostatectomy. Twelve patients (10 GG2, 2 GG1) had Decipher testing. The median Decipher for the 10 GG2 biopsies was 0.53, corresponding to intermediate Decipher risk. The median Decipher for the 2 GG1 biopsies was 0.40, corresponding to low Decipher risk. Conclusions AIP in the absence of other high-risk features at biopsy may be a harbinger of subsequent adverse pathology on follow-up. AIP is an entity that may require more frequent active surveillance in the absence of other high-risk features.

International Journal of Surgical Pathology
University of California, San Francisco (US), Stanford Medicine (US), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon