Griefbots and Digital Bereavement: An Exploratory Review of Evidence, Risks, and Simulated Presence

Digital technologies now form part of many experiences of bereavement, yet memorials, web-based interventions, avatars, recreated voices, and generative simulations are not equivalent. This exploratory review organizes the available evidence by technological mechanism and study design. Xygkou et al. (2023) studied 10 chatbot users, four of whom configured systems to simulate deceased people; Li and Lan (2026) separately studied 26 deadbot users. These qualitative studies describe experience and meaning-making, not clinical efficacy. Web-based interventions show benefits in defined populations, but this adjacent evidence does not establish griefbot efficacy. The review also considers continuing bonds, memory reconstruction, privacy, consent, posthumous rights, and commercial design risks. Evidence concerning Latin America remains under-examined, and conclusions are limited by incomplete historical search records.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228261505683
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Griefbots and Digital Bereavement: An Exploratory Review of Evidence, Risks, and Simulated Presence

Diego Alberto Parra Garzón
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Griefbots and Digital Bereavement: An Exploratory Review of Evidence, Risks, and Simulated Presence

Diego Alberto Parra Garzón
article en

Abstract

Digital technologies now form part of many experiences of bereavement, yet memorials, web-based interventions, avatars, recreated voices, and generative simulations are not equivalent. This exploratory review organizes the available evidence by technological mechanism and study design. Xygkou et al. (2023) studied 10 chatbot users, four of whom configured systems to simulate deceased people; Li and Lan (2026) separately studied 26 deadbot users. These qualitative studies describe experience and meaning-making, not clinical efficacy. Web-based interventions show benefits in defined populations, but this adjacent evidence does not establish griefbot efficacy. The review also considers continuing bonds, memory reconstruction, privacy, consent, posthumous rights, and commercial design risks. Evidence concerning Latin America remains under-examined, and conclusions are limited by incomplete historical search records.

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon