Explainable AI-based framework for 3D structural as-built modeling of aging buildings in Korea using laser scanning

Purpose This study proposes a framework for automatically generating 3D structural as-built models of aging buildings by predicting the structural dimensions of members concealed behind finishes using laser scanning and machine learning, particularly when original construction drawings are unavailable. Design/methodology/approach Laser scanning captures building geometry but includes both structural components and non-structural finishes (e.g. plaster), making it unsuitable for directly extracting structural dimensions. To address this, the proposed framework extracts geometric features from point clouds and employs machine learning techniques to predict structural dimensions of columns, beams, walls and slabs. Six machine learning models – Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Linear Regression and Support Vector Regression (SVR) – were trained using data collected on 1,560 column elements, 2,875 beam elements, 870 wall elements and 148 slab elements across 50 buildings and validated through two real-world case studies. Findings The best-performing model achieved MAPE of 10.51% for column width (95%CI: 8.47–12.71), 12.98% for column depth (95% CI: 10.86–15.41), 14.91% for beam width (95% CI: 13.63–16.15), 18.91% for beam depth (95% CI: 17.94–19.90), 10.42% for walls (95% CI: 8.89–12.00) and 10.70% for slabs (95% CI: 7.11–14.50). The predicted dimensions enabled reconstruction of 3D structural as-built models without relying on original drawings; the estimates are intended for planning-stage use. Practical implications The framework provides a non-destructive, full-coverage estimate of structural member dimensions that would otherwise require original drawings or local removal of finishes. In practice, it is intended to reduce reliance on destructive investigation and, through the SHAP analysis, indicates where confirmatory openings could be prioritized, thereby supporting planning-stage decisions for the maintenance and retrofitting of buildings whose drawings are missing or outdated. Originality/value This study is among the first to formulate the discrepancy between laser-scanned surface geometry and concealed structural dimensions as a prediction problem and to propose a framework that returns the predicted dimensions to a 3D structural as-built model. Machine learning provides the enabling component, and explainability is used to direct in situ verification rather than as a methodological contribution in itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2025-1023
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Explainable AI-based framework for 3D structural as-built modeling of aging buildings in Korea using laser scanning

Byungjoo Choi, Jinyoung Kim, Hwajeong Choi
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Explainable AI-based framework for 3D structural as-built modeling of aging buildings in Korea using laser scanning

Byungjoo Choi, Jinyoung Kim, Hwajeong Choi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study proposes a framework for automatically generating 3D structural as-built models of aging buildings by predicting the structural dimensions of members concealed behind finishes using laser scanning and machine learning, particularly when original construction drawings are unavailable. Design/methodology/approach Laser scanning captures building geometry but includes both structural components and non-structural finishes (e.g. plaster), making it unsuitable for directly extracting structural dimensions. To address this, the proposed framework extracts geometric features from point clouds and employs machine learning techniques to predict structural dimensions of columns, beams, walls and slabs. Six machine learning models – Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Linear Regression and Support Vector Regression (SVR) – were trained using data collected on 1,560 column elements, 2,875 beam elements, 870 wall elements and 148 slab elements across 50 buildings and validated through two real-world case studies. Findings The best-performing model achieved MAPE of 10.51% for column width (95%CI: 8.47–12.71), 12.98% for column depth (95% CI: 10.86–15.41), 14.91% for beam width (95% CI: 13.63–16.15), 18.91% for beam depth (95% CI: 17.94–19.90), 10.42% for walls (95% CI: 8.89–12.00) and 10.70% for slabs (95% CI: 7.11–14.50). The predicted dimensions enabled reconstruction of 3D structural as-built models without relying on original drawings; the estimates are intended for planning-stage use. Practical implications The framework provides a non-destructive, full-coverage estimate of structural member dimensions that would otherwise require original drawings or local removal of finishes. In practice, it is intended to reduce reliance on destructive investigation and, through the SHAP analysis, indicates where confirmatory openings could be prioritized, thereby supporting planning-stage decisions for the maintenance and retrofitting of buildings whose drawings are missing or outdated. Originality/value This study is among the first to formulate the discrepancy between laser-scanned surface geometry and concealed structural dimensions as a prediction problem and to propose a framework that returns the predicted dimensions to a 3D structural as-built model. Machine learning provides the enabling component, and explainability is used to direct in situ verification rather than as a methodological contribution in itself.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Ajou University (KR)
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon