Differential Recurrence Risk in Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Post-Catheter Ablation: HFpEF as an Independent Predictor

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have bidirectional pathophysiological interactions. Although HFpEF has been associated with arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), whether its impact differs across AF subtypes remains incompletely understood. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of HFpEF on AF recurrence following RFCA in paroxysmal versus persistent AF. Methods: A total of 509 patients who underwent RFCA for AF were enrolled in our retrospective study. These patients were categorized into two groups: the normal group and the HFpEF group. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (≥30 s) after the initial 3-month blanking period post-index ablation, without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Results: HFpEF was present in 15.9% of the cohort. At the 12-month follow-up visit, sinus rhythm maintenance was recorded in 62.7% of the patients in the HFpEF group versus 82.0% in the normal group (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified HFpEF as an independent predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–3.38, p = 0.004). After 1:1 propensity score matching, HFpEF remained an independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.06–3.50, p = 0.03). A subgroup analysis showed a robust association in paroxysmal AF (HR = 6.00, 95% CI: 3.07–11.73, p < 0.001) but not in persistent AF (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 0.80–2.55, p = 0.231), with a significant interaction (p for interaction = 0.022). During the 12-month follow-up visit, an improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification could be seen in 82.7% of the cohort, with all Class III patients showing a functional improvement. Conclusions: There is an increased risk of recurrence in patients with HFpEF post-ablation, particularly among patients with paroxysmal AF. Notably, catheter ablation remains effective at improving the NYHA functional class, even in HFpEF patients. These findings support the utilization of HFpEF as a key indicator for pre-procedural risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13110584
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Differential Recurrence Risk in Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Post-Catheter Ablation: HFpEF as an Independent Predictor

Fengxiang Zhang, Li Jiang, Yuan He, Nishant Yadav et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Differential Recurrence Risk in Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Post-Catheter Ablation: HFpEF as an Independent Predictor

Fengxiang Zhang, Li Jiang, Yuan He, Nishant Yadav, Xuesheng Fan, Yan Dong, Qiushi Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have bidirectional pathophysiological interactions. Although HFpEF has been associated with arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), whether its impact differs across AF subtypes remains incompletely understood. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of HFpEF on AF recurrence following RFCA in paroxysmal versus persistent AF. Methods: A total of 509 patients who underwent RFCA for AF were enrolled in our retrospective study. These patients were categorized into two groups: the normal group and the HFpEF group. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (≥30 s) after the initial 3-month blanking period post-index ablation, without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Results: HFpEF was present in 15.9% of the cohort. At the 12-month follow-up visit, sinus rhythm maintenance was recorded in 62.7% of the patients in the HFpEF group versus 82.0% in the normal group (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified HFpEF as an independent predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–3.38, p = 0.004). After 1:1 propensity score matching, HFpEF remained an independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.06–3.50, p = 0.03). A subgroup analysis showed a robust association in paroxysmal AF (HR = 6.00, 95% CI: 3.07–11.73, p < 0.001) but not in persistent AF (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 0.80–2.55, p = 0.231), with a significant interaction (p for interaction = 0.022). During the 12-month follow-up visit, an improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification could be seen in 82.7% of the cohort, with all Class III patients showing a functional improvement. Conclusions: There is an increased risk of recurrence in patients with HFpEF post-ablation, particularly among patients with paroxysmal AF. Notably, catheter ablation remains effective at improving the NYHA functional class, even in HFpEF patients. These findings support the utilization of HFpEF as a key indicator for pre-procedural risk stratification.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseVol. 13(11)
Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon