Automated Astrometric Calibration of Astronomical Images with Gaia DR3 and Residual Error Decomposition

Abstract Precise astrometric validation requires residuals between catalog-predicted positions and measured stellar locations, not between a prediction and its nearest integer pixel. This work presents a deterministic Flexible Image Transport System (FITS) calibration and residual-analysis pipeline that combines median-background suppression, blind plate solving with Astrometry.net, Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) reference-star projection, Astrometry.net source-list association, bounded two-dimensional Gaussian centroid refinement, robust outlier rejection, and an affine decomposition of systematic and random residual components. Four satellite-tracking FITS frames (GAOFEN 11 − 3, NIGERIASAT-2, THEOS, and YAOGAN-50) were processed independently in raw and background-suppressed branches. Astrometry.net solved all eight branches. The raw images, however, produced only 3, 6, 1, and 4 validated Gaussian matches, leaving three of four raw branches below the six-match statistical threshold. Background suppression increased the corresponding match counts to 14, 43, 30, and 53; all four suppressed branches therefore supported full residual analysis. Suppressed-branch Gaia matching completeness ranged from 42.4% to 75.0% (median 43.2%). Measured total root-mean-square (RMS) residuals were 1.589–3.932 arcsec (median 3.153 arcsec), while post-affine random RMS ranged from 0.447 to 3.196 arcsec (median 2.731 arcsec). The former nearest-pixel metric yielded a much narrower 1.555–1.704 arcsec range and underestimated measured RMS in three of four fields, demonstrating why it cannot serve as an astrometric-accuracy estimator. The results show that background suppression primarily improves usable source-measurement yield in this data set, while the systematic–random decomposition provides a more defensible characterization of calibration quality. Because the local Gaia mirror lacks proper-motion and formal-error columns and the demonstration contains only four frames, the reported values are treated as a pilot validation rather than a population-wide accuracy claim.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11419953/v1
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Automated Astrometric Calibration of Astronomical Images with Gaia DR3 and Residual Error Decomposition

Mohammed A. H. Abozied, Abdelhameed S. Eltanany, Hossam M. Hendy, Mohamed H. Mahgoub
Research Square
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
preprint

Automated Astrometric Calibration of Astronomical Images with Gaia DR3 and Residual Error Decomposition

Mohammed A. H. Abozied, Abdelhameed S. Eltanany, Hossam M. Hendy, Mohamed H. Mahgoub
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Precise astrometric validation requires residuals between catalog-predicted positions and measured stellar locations, not between a prediction and its nearest integer pixel. This work presents a deterministic Flexible Image Transport System (FITS) calibration and residual-analysis pipeline that combines median-background suppression, blind plate solving with Astrometry.net, Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) reference-star projection, Astrometry.net source-list association, bounded two-dimensional Gaussian centroid refinement, robust outlier rejection, and an affine decomposition of systematic and random residual components. Four satellite-tracking FITS frames (GAOFEN 11 − 3, NIGERIASAT-2, THEOS, and YAOGAN-50) were processed independently in raw and background-suppressed branches. Astrometry.net solved all eight branches. The raw images, however, produced only 3, 6, 1, and 4 validated Gaussian matches, leaving three of four raw branches below the six-match statistical threshold. Background suppression increased the corresponding match counts to 14, 43, 30, and 53; all four suppressed branches therefore supported full residual analysis. Suppressed-branch Gaia matching completeness ranged from 42.4% to 75.0% (median 43.2%). Measured total root-mean-square (RMS) residuals were 1.589–3.932 arcsec (median 3.153 arcsec), while post-affine random RMS ranged from 0.447 to 3.196 arcsec (median 2.731 arcsec). The former nearest-pixel metric yielded a much narrower 1.555–1.704 arcsec range and underestimated measured RMS in three of four fields, demonstrating why it cannot serve as an astrometric-accuracy estimator. The results show that background suppression primarily improves usable source-measurement yield in this data set, while the systematic–random decomposition provides a more defensible characterization of calibration quality. Because the local Gaia mirror lacks proper-motion and formal-error columns and the demonstration contains only four frames, the reported values are treated as a pilot validation rather than a population-wide accuracy claim.

Research Square
Military Technical College (EG)
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon