Decision uncertainty in particulate-matter measurement comparability under sparse reference sampling

Abstract A comparability verdict between a reference and a candidate measurement method depends on the reference observations supporting the fitted relationship. We examined how far such a verdict remains determinate when the same paired record is reduced to fewer reference dates. Lineage-consistent daily PM₂.₅ records from 45 US sites (2022–2025) supplied 127 episodes and 43,576 same-site reference–equivalent-method pairs. All phases of 1-in-3, 1-in-6 and 1-in-12 calendars were compared with each episode’s near-daily record. An ordinary least squares (OLS) slope–intercept bias envelope from the US equivalence criteria supplied point verdicts, and a circular moving-block bootstrap classified their stability. Under the primary 0.95/0.05 stability rule, 82 near-daily benchmarks (64.6%) were boundary-uncertain. On the 45 benchmark-stable episodes, site-equal sparse indeterminacy was 33.02% (95% confidence interval 21.07–46.07%), 63.77% (52.98–73.75%) and 73.81% (63.69–82.56%), and 88 of 90 point mismatches became indeterminate rather than opposite stable verdicts. Levels depended on the stability cutoff, but the ordering held at every cutoff from 0.80 to 0.99 and under data-driven and calendar-duration-matched block bootstraps, event exclusion and removal of high-concentration days. A baseline using only the near-daily record and its serial dependence reproduced the 1-in-6 and 1-in-12 levels within 4 percentage points. No additional calendar point-mismatch risk was detected relative to size-matched random sampling; an exploratory state comparison suggested lower indeterminacy than random sampling at 1-in-3. In a known-truth simulation at 1-in-12, interval coverage was about 88%; records with true parameters inside the envelope were mostly indeterminate, and 14 of their 64 stable verdicts had the wrong direction. Reporting the bootstrap state and reference support alongside the point verdict shows how much evidence a comparability verdict carries, and benchmark-based baselines may help assess how much determinacy a sparser schedule would retain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aec0bc
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Decision uncertainty in particulate-matter measurement comparability under sparse reference sampling

Gengpei Zhang, Mengjie Li, Le Zhao
Measurement Science and Technology
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Decision uncertainty in particulate-matter measurement comparability under sparse reference sampling

Gengpei Zhang, Mengjie Li, Le Zhao
article en

Abstract

Abstract A comparability verdict between a reference and a candidate measurement method depends on the reference observations supporting the fitted relationship. We examined how far such a verdict remains determinate when the same paired record is reduced to fewer reference dates. Lineage-consistent daily PM₂.₅ records from 45 US sites (2022–2025) supplied 127 episodes and 43,576 same-site reference–equivalent-method pairs. All phases of 1-in-3, 1-in-6 and 1-in-12 calendars were compared with each episode’s near-daily record. An ordinary least squares (OLS) slope–intercept bias envelope from the US equivalence criteria supplied point verdicts, and a circular moving-block bootstrap classified their stability. Under the primary 0.95/0.05 stability rule, 82 near-daily benchmarks (64.6%) were boundary-uncertain. On the 45 benchmark-stable episodes, site-equal sparse indeterminacy was 33.02% (95% confidence interval 21.07–46.07%), 63.77% (52.98–73.75%) and 73.81% (63.69–82.56%), and 88 of 90 point mismatches became indeterminate rather than opposite stable verdicts. Levels depended on the stability cutoff, but the ordering held at every cutoff from 0.80 to 0.99 and under data-driven and calendar-duration-matched block bootstraps, event exclusion and removal of high-concentration days. A baseline using only the near-daily record and its serial dependence reproduced the 1-in-6 and 1-in-12 levels within 4 percentage points. No additional calendar point-mismatch risk was detected relative to size-matched random sampling; an exploratory state comparison suggested lower indeterminacy than random sampling at 1-in-3. In a known-truth simulation at 1-in-12, interval coverage was about 88%; records with true parameters inside the envelope were mostly indeterminate, and 14 of their 64 stable verdicts had the wrong direction. Reporting the bootstrap state and reference support alongside the point verdict shows how much evidence a comparability verdict carries, and benchmark-based baselines may help assess how much determinacy a sparser schedule would retain.

Measurement Science and Technology
Yangtze University (CN)
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon