Spectacle Compliance and Associated Factors Among Adults with Refractive Error Attending a Tertiary Eye Care Center in Nepal: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

The benefit of spectacles depends on sustained use, but evidence on spectacle compliance among adults in low-resource settings is limited. This hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed self-reported compliance with prescribed spectacle wear, reasons for non-compliance, and associated factors among adults attending a tertiary eye care center in Nepal. Adults aged ≥18 years who had been prescribed spectacles at least 1 month earlier were recruited consecutively and interviewed using a structured questionnaire linked to clinical records. Associated factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression with variables selected a priori and penalized sensitivity analyses. Of 416 participants, 144 (34.6%; 95% CI 30.2–39.3%) reported compliance. Discomfort (15.8%), unclear vision (15.1%), appearance concerns (12.9%), and forgetfulness (11.8%) were the most frequent reasons for non-compliance. Compared with spectacles dispensed at the study hospital, spectacles from optical shops were consistently associated with lower odds of compliance (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.07, 95% CI 0.03–0.20; 0.10 after adjusting for time since the last spectacle change), whereas the association for spectacles from other hospitals (AOR 0.42, 0.25–0.71) was attenuated after this adjustment (AOR 0.54, 0.30–0.96). The association with older age was not robust. Nearly two-thirds of adults did not report using their spectacles as prescribed; dispensing quality and follow-up warrant prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vision
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10050097
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Spectacle Compliance and Associated Factors Among Adults with Refractive Error Attending a Tertiary Eye Care Center in Nepal: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Mario Cantó-Cerdán, Hari Bahadur Thapa, Bishal Mani Tripathi, Soniya Shukla
Vision
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Spectacle Compliance and Associated Factors Among Adults with Refractive Error Attending a Tertiary Eye Care Center in Nepal: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Mario Cantó-Cerdán, Hari Bahadur Thapa, Bishal Mani Tripathi, Soniya Shukla
article en

Abstract

The benefit of spectacles depends on sustained use, but evidence on spectacle compliance among adults in low-resource settings is limited. This hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed self-reported compliance with prescribed spectacle wear, reasons for non-compliance, and associated factors among adults attending a tertiary eye care center in Nepal. Adults aged ≥18 years who had been prescribed spectacles at least 1 month earlier were recruited consecutively and interviewed using a structured questionnaire linked to clinical records. Associated factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression with variables selected a priori and penalized sensitivity analyses. Of 416 participants, 144 (34.6%; 95% CI 30.2–39.3%) reported compliance. Discomfort (15.8%), unclear vision (15.1%), appearance concerns (12.9%), and forgetfulness (11.8%) were the most frequent reasons for non-compliance. Compared with spectacles dispensed at the study hospital, spectacles from optical shops were consistently associated with lower odds of compliance (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.07, 95% CI 0.03–0.20; 0.10 after adjusting for time since the last spectacle change), whereas the association for spectacles from other hospitals (AOR 0.42, 0.25–0.71) was attenuated after this adjustment (AOR 0.54, 0.30–0.96). The association with older age was not robust. Nearly two-thirds of adults did not report using their spectacles as prescribed; dispensing quality and follow-up warrant prospective evaluation.

VisionVol. 10(5)
University of Alicante (ES), Lumbini Eye Institute (NP)
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon