Continuous voter-register maintenance in Indonesia: digital systems, public correction, and electoral accountability

Introduction Voter registration is often treated as routine election administration, although the register determines who can exercise the right to vote and how election authorities respond to disputed records. This mini review examines Indonesia’s continuous voter data updating framework within a decentralized electoral system. Methods The review analyzes three KPU instruments: KPU Decision No. 27/2023 on voter-list preparation for the 2024 general election, KPU Decision No. 81/2022 on Sidalih Berkelanjutan and the Lindungihakmu portal, and KPU Regulation No. 1/2025 on continuous voter data updating. These documents are examined alongside scholarship on voter registration, electoral management, election technology, public-sector data governance, and electoral integrity. Results Indonesia’s framework combines population-data synchronization, Coklit, tiered verification and recapitulation, Sidalih-based data management, public correction, and personal-data protection. It treats the voter register as a record maintained across electoral cycles rather than as a list prepared only before election day. Discussion Continuous updating may improve coordination and correction, but credibility depends on measurable register quality, traceable data changes, privacy safeguards, and administrative capacity across regency and city election offices. Estonia, Canada, and Australia illustrate different approaches: population-register integration and electronic polling-place lists, a permanent national register updated continuously, and a hybrid system combining administrative data matching with paper and electronic lists. Despite these differences, credible digital registration requires reliable source data, accessible correction channels, secure access, operational continuity, and transparent quality standards. Future research should examine how these conditions affect electoral inclusion, accountability, and public confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1888897
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Continuous voter-register maintenance in Indonesia: digital systems, public correction, and electoral accountability

Nina Karlina, Ramadhan Pancasilawan, Ahmad Nur Hidayat, R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata
Frontiers in Political Science
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Continuous voter-register maintenance in Indonesia: digital systems, public correction, and electoral accountability

Nina Karlina, Ramadhan Pancasilawan, Ahmad Nur Hidayat, R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata
article en

Abstract

Introduction Voter registration is often treated as routine election administration, although the register determines who can exercise the right to vote and how election authorities respond to disputed records. This mini review examines Indonesia’s continuous voter data updating framework within a decentralized electoral system. Methods The review analyzes three KPU instruments: KPU Decision No. 27/2023 on voter-list preparation for the 2024 general election, KPU Decision No. 81/2022 on Sidalih Berkelanjutan and the Lindungihakmu portal, and KPU Regulation No. 1/2025 on continuous voter data updating. These documents are examined alongside scholarship on voter registration, electoral management, election technology, public-sector data governance, and electoral integrity. Results Indonesia’s framework combines population-data synchronization, Coklit, tiered verification and recapitulation, Sidalih-based data management, public correction, and personal-data protection. It treats the voter register as a record maintained across electoral cycles rather than as a list prepared only before election day. Discussion Continuous updating may improve coordination and correction, but credibility depends on measurable register quality, traceable data changes, privacy safeguards, and administrative capacity across regency and city election offices. Estonia, Canada, and Australia illustrate different approaches: population-register integration and electronic polling-place lists, a permanent national register updated continuously, and a hybrid system combining administrative data matching with paper and electronic lists. Despite these differences, credible digital registration requires reliable source data, accessible correction channels, secure access, operational continuity, and transparent quality standards. Future research should examine how these conditions affect electoral inclusion, accountability, and public confidence.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon