Research on Blast Wave Pressure Engineering Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Joint Calibration

For blast wave pressure measurement in explosion fields, conventional static-based uncertainty evaluation ignores factors including parasitic effects and engineering installation. This paper presents an engineering uncertainty evaluation method based on joint calibration, combining quasi-static calibration and dynamic calibration. Engineering measurement uncertainty is decomposed into four components: instrument metrological performance, parasitic effects, engineering installation, and dynamic calibration. Thermal and vibration simulation, blast wave reflection theory and grey system theory are applied to assess each component respectively, followed by the synthesis of standard and expanded uncertainty. Tests were performed on the measurement system equipped with a PCB 113B24 sensor yield with an expanded uncertainty of 9.8% for a coverage factor of k = 2, which meets the engineering accuracy requirement ranging from 8% to 10%. Dynamic calibration uncertainty dominates total uncertainty, followed by engineering installation and parasitic effect uncertainty, while instrument related uncertainty is minimal. Finally, the corresponding improvement strategies are proposed to further enhance the measurement accuracy. This work provides theoretical and technical support for the formulation of specifications for blast wave measurement uncertainty evaluation and explosion damage assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26227134
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Research on Blast Wave Pressure Engineering Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Joint Calibration

Fan Yang, Deren Kong, Chuanrong Zhao, Hongzhen Zhu et al.
Sensors
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Research on Blast Wave Pressure Engineering Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Joint Calibration

Fan Yang, Deren Kong, Chuanrong Zhao, Hongzhen Zhu, Qiangwei Kou
article en

Abstract

For blast wave pressure measurement in explosion fields, conventional static-based uncertainty evaluation ignores factors including parasitic effects and engineering installation. This paper presents an engineering uncertainty evaluation method based on joint calibration, combining quasi-static calibration and dynamic calibration. Engineering measurement uncertainty is decomposed into four components: instrument metrological performance, parasitic effects, engineering installation, and dynamic calibration. Thermal and vibration simulation, blast wave reflection theory and grey system theory are applied to assess each component respectively, followed by the synthesis of standard and expanded uncertainty. Tests were performed on the measurement system equipped with a PCB 113B24 sensor yield with an expanded uncertainty of 9.8% for a coverage factor of k = 2, which meets the engineering accuracy requirement ranging from 8% to 10%. Dynamic calibration uncertainty dominates total uncertainty, followed by engineering installation and parasitic effect uncertainty, while instrument related uncertainty is minimal. Finally, the corresponding improvement strategies are proposed to further enhance the measurement accuracy. This work provides theoretical and technical support for the formulation of specifications for blast wave measurement uncertainty evaluation and explosion damage assessment.

SensorsVol. 26(22)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Wuxi University (CN), Anhui University of Technology (CN)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon