Scaffolding young children’s AI use: opening pedagogical black boxes in early childhood classrooms

Abstract Given their real-time responsive capabilities, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been positioned as cognitive partners for young children. However, research and policy directives have tended toward technological determinism, which black-boxes how these technologies function in early childhood education (ECE). Applying Actor-Network Theory (ANT), this qualitative case study deconstructs pedagogical black boxes during a plant inquiry unit involving a teacher, four children (aged 5–6), and AI-integrated devices. The findings provide a typology of three pedagogical black boxes: operational (obscuring technical constraints), epistemic (obscuring knowledge construction), and relational (obscuring negotiations of agency and classroom authority). Analysis of the case illustrated how these black boxes opened through distance (children’s communication gaps), breakdown (AI errors), and innovation (negotiation over AI use), revealing hidden dynamics in AI integration, such as uncertainty, people at work, decisions, competition, and controversies. Teacher scaffolding emerged as a key mediator of child-AI interactions, translating children’s open-ended inquiries into AI-legible inputs, transforming AI errors into opportunities for evaluative judgement, and recalibrating children’s AI interactions into child-led scientific inquiry. Ultimately, the paper shows that the seamless integration of AI is neither realistic nor pedagogically effective, and exemplifies how emergent frictions can foster young learners’ AI literacy, evaluative judgement, and relational agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Brain and Child
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-026-00046-2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Scaffolding young children’s AI use: opening pedagogical black boxes in early childhood classrooms

Xinyun Hu, Boris Wai Yan Choy
AI Brain and Child
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Scaffolding young children’s AI use: opening pedagogical black boxes in early childhood classrooms

Xinyun Hu, Boris Wai Yan Choy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given their real-time responsive capabilities, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been positioned as cognitive partners for young children. However, research and policy directives have tended toward technological determinism, which black-boxes how these technologies function in early childhood education (ECE). Applying Actor-Network Theory (ANT), this qualitative case study deconstructs pedagogical black boxes during a plant inquiry unit involving a teacher, four children (aged 5–6), and AI-integrated devices. The findings provide a typology of three pedagogical black boxes: operational (obscuring technical constraints), epistemic (obscuring knowledge construction), and relational (obscuring negotiations of agency and classroom authority). Analysis of the case illustrated how these black boxes opened through distance (children’s communication gaps), breakdown (AI errors), and innovation (negotiation over AI use), revealing hidden dynamics in AI integration, such as uncertainty, people at work, decisions, competition, and controversies. Teacher scaffolding emerged as a key mediator of child-AI interactions, translating children’s open-ended inquiries into AI-legible inputs, transforming AI errors into opportunities for evaluative judgement, and recalibrating children’s AI interactions into child-led scientific inquiry. Ultimately, the paper shows that the seamless integration of AI is neither realistic nor pedagogically effective, and exemplifies how emergent frictions can foster young learners’ AI literacy, evaluative judgement, and relational agency.

AI Brain and ChildVol. 2(1)
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon