Why exposure-time transformations do not generally homogenize Markov-modulated Poisson processes: A common-clock criterion and corrected calendar-time inference

Avanzi et al. (2021) introduced an exposure-modulated Markov-modulated Poisson process in which a homogeneous continuous-time Markov chain $M$ with generator $Q$ modulates a counting process with conditional intensity $\gamma(t)\lambda_{M(t-)}$. They asserted that the exposure clock $\rho(t)=\int_0^t\gamma(s)ds$ converts this model into a homogeneous MMPP while leaving $Q$ unchanged, and they used that representation in an expectation--maximization calibration scheme. The published argument contains several mathematical errors. We show that its central homogenization theorem cannot be correct under the stated model when $\gamma$ is nonconstant. Time-changing only the count leaves it modulated by $M(\rho^{-1}(u))$, not by $M(u)$; time-changing the whole pair instead produces the time-dependent hidden generator $Q/\gamma(\rho^{-1}(u))$. More generally, we prove a necessary and sufficient common-clock criterion: if the hidden generator and event rates are multiplied by $a(t)$ and $b(t)$, respectively, one deterministic clock makes both constant if and only if $a(t)/b(t)$ is constant almost everywhere. We also explain why the supporting Markov and homogeneity lemmas do not establish the published result and identify consequential inconsistencies in the printed EM construction, including an incorrect hidden-transition statistic, reversal of event and exposure-change kernels, and recursions that treat deterministic exposure breakpoints as though they incremented the observed count. The exposure-modulated model itself remains well defined. We therefore derive its exact calendar-time likelihood, a corrected EM algorithm, and a stable piecewise-constant implementation, together with an $L^1$ perturbation bound for exposure approximation. Thus the published homogeneous representation and the inferential formulas built upon it are invalid as stated, while direct calendar-time inference provides a coherent replacement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24138374
Primary Topic
Probability and Statistical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Why exposure-time transformations do not generally homogenize Markov-modulated Poisson processes: A common-clock criterion and corrected calendar-time inference

Bowen Higgins
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Probability and Statistical Research
article

Why exposure-time transformations do not generally homogenize Markov-modulated Poisson processes: A common-clock criterion and corrected calendar-time inference

Bowen Higgins
article en

Abstract

Avanzi et al. (2021) introduced an exposure-modulated Markov-modulated Poisson process in which a homogeneous continuous-time Markov chain $M$ with generator $Q$ modulates a counting process with conditional intensity $\gamma(t)\lambda_{M(t-)}$. They asserted that the exposure clock $\rho(t)=\int_0^t\gamma(s)ds$ converts this model into a homogeneous MMPP while leaving $Q$ unchanged, and they used that representation in an expectation--maximization calibration scheme. The published argument contains several mathematical errors. We show that its central homogenization theorem cannot be correct under the stated model when $\gamma$ is nonconstant. Time-changing only the count leaves it modulated by $M(\rho^{-1}(u))$, not by $M(u)$; time-changing the whole pair instead produces the time-dependent hidden generator $Q/\gamma(\rho^{-1}(u))$. More generally, we prove a necessary and sufficient common-clock criterion: if the hidden generator and event rates are multiplied by $a(t)$ and $b(t)$, respectively, one deterministic clock makes both constant if and only if $a(t)/b(t)$ is constant almost everywhere. We also explain why the supporting Markov and homogeneity lemmas do not establish the published result and identify consequential inconsistencies in the printed EM construction, including an incorrect hidden-transition statistic, reversal of event and exposure-change kernels, and recursions that treat deterministic exposure breakpoints as though they incremented the observed count. The exposure-modulated model itself remains well defined. We therefore derive its exact calendar-time likelihood, a corrected EM algorithm, and a stable piecewise-constant implementation, together with an $L^1$ perturbation bound for exposure approximation. Thus the published homogeneous representation and the inferential formulas built upon it are invalid as stated, while direct calendar-time inference provides a coherent replacement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Probability and Statistical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon