Comparación de la prolongación analgésica con dexmedetomidina a dosis de 25 vs 50 mcg como adyuvante a ropivacaína en bloqueo supraclavicular para cirugía de antebrazo en el Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo

Perineural dexmedetomidine prolongs brachial plexus block analgesia, but the optimal dose remains under discussion. The aim was to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia with 50 µg versus 25 µg of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. A parallel-group randomised clinical trial was conducted at Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo, Aguascalientes, Mexico, between July and December 2025. Twenty-six adults with ASA physical status I to III scheduled for elective surgery were allocated to 18 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 25 µg (n = 13) or 50 µg (n = 13) of dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia; secondary outcomes were 24-hour morphine consumption, motor block duration and adverse events. All participants completed follow-up. Time to first rescue was 15.81 ± 1.29 hours with 50 µg and 11.55 ± 1.17 hours with 25 µg (difference: 4.26 hours; 95% CI: 3.26 to 5.26; p < .001). Morphine consumption fell from 12.00 to 6.15 mg (difference: −5.85 mg; 95% CI: −7.86 to −3.84), and motor block was prolonged by 2.96 hours (95% CI: 2.14 to 3.78). Sedation (30.8% vs. 7.7%) and bradycardia (15.4% vs. 7.7%) were more frequent with 50 µg, without significant differences. It was concluded that 50 µg prolonged analgesia and reduced opioid consumption, at the cost of longer motor block; the sample size does not rule out more adverse effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica
Published
2026-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63371/ic.v5.n4.a1863
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparación de la prolongación analgésica con dexmedetomidina a dosis de 25 vs 50 mcg como adyuvante a ropivacaína en bloqueo supraclavicular para cirugía de antebrazo en el Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo

Roberto López Martínez, July Celeste Arteaga Ramos
Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparación de la prolongación analgésica con dexmedetomidina a dosis de 25 vs 50 mcg como adyuvante a ropivacaína en bloqueo supraclavicular para cirugía de antebrazo en el Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo

Roberto López Martínez, July Celeste Arteaga Ramos
article en

Abstract

Perineural dexmedetomidine prolongs brachial plexus block analgesia, but the optimal dose remains under discussion. The aim was to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia with 50 µg versus 25 µg of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. A parallel-group randomised clinical trial was conducted at Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo, Aguascalientes, Mexico, between July and December 2025. Twenty-six adults with ASA physical status I to III scheduled for elective surgery were allocated to 18 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 25 µg (n = 13) or 50 µg (n = 13) of dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia; secondary outcomes were 24-hour morphine consumption, motor block duration and adverse events. All participants completed follow-up. Time to first rescue was 15.81 ± 1.29 hours with 50 µg and 11.55 ± 1.17 hours with 25 µg (difference: 4.26 hours; 95% CI: 3.26 to 5.26; p < .001). Morphine consumption fell from 12.00 to 6.15 mg (difference: −5.85 mg; 95% CI: −7.86 to −3.84), and motor block was prolonged by 2.96 hours (95% CI: 2.14 to 3.78). Sedation (30.8% vs. 7.7%) and bradycardia (15.4% vs. 7.7%) were more frequent with 50 µg, without significant differences. It was concluded that 50 µg prolonged analgesia and reduced opioid consumption, at the cost of longer motor block; the sample size does not rule out more adverse effects.

Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y AcadémicaVol. 5(4)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon