Comparative Prognostic Value of Preoperative HALP and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Background and Objectives: We compared the prognostic value of the preoperative hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) index and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index (CIPI) after colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 264 patients who underwent colorectal adenocarcinoma resection between 2014 and 2019. The primary Cox model entered both log2-transformed indices simultaneously and adjusted for age, sex, ASA class, neoadjuvant treatment, and recorded pathological stage. Discrimination was assessed using 3- and 5-year time-dependent ROC analysis and Harrell’s C-index. Cut-off-based analyses were exploratory. Results: Over a median follow-up of 86.9 months, 120 patients (45.5%) died. In the primary model, the adjusted hazard ratio per doubling was 0.822 for HALP (95% CI 0.661–1.023) and 1.058 for CIPI (95% CI 0.978–1.145). The 3-year AUCs were 0.649 for HALP and 0.699 for CIPI (p = 0.261). The 5-year AUCs were 0.631 and 0.636, respectively (p = 0.887). In exploratory analyses, the cohort-derived high-CIPI group had poorer adjusted survival (aHR 1.703, 95% CI 1.138–2.548). Both continuous indices were associated with survival in stage I–III disease, whereas neither was statistically significant in patients without neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Both indices showed modest discrimination. The adjusted associations varied by model and subgroup. Incremental clinical value was not established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62112208
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparative Prognostic Value of Preoperative HALP and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Cem Kaan Parsak, Burak Yavuz, İshak Aydın, Uğur Topal et al.
Medicina
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Comparative Prognostic Value of Preoperative HALP and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Cem Kaan Parsak, Burak Yavuz, İshak Aydın, Uğur Topal, İsmail Cem Yurtçu, Kubilay Furkan Işıker, İsmail Cem Eray, İsa Armağan Çıklar
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We compared the prognostic value of the preoperative hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) index and Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index (CIPI) after colorectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 264 patients who underwent colorectal adenocarcinoma resection between 2014 and 2019. The primary Cox model entered both log2-transformed indices simultaneously and adjusted for age, sex, ASA class, neoadjuvant treatment, and recorded pathological stage. Discrimination was assessed using 3- and 5-year time-dependent ROC analysis and Harrell’s C-index. Cut-off-based analyses were exploratory. Results: Over a median follow-up of 86.9 months, 120 patients (45.5%) died. In the primary model, the adjusted hazard ratio per doubling was 0.822 for HALP (95% CI 0.661–1.023) and 1.058 for CIPI (95% CI 0.978–1.145). The 3-year AUCs were 0.649 for HALP and 0.699 for CIPI (p = 0.261). The 5-year AUCs were 0.631 and 0.636, respectively (p = 0.887). In exploratory analyses, the cohort-derived high-CIPI group had poorer adjusted survival (aHR 1.703, 95% CI 1.138–2.548). Both continuous indices were associated with survival in stage I–III disease, whereas neither was statistically significant in patients without neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Both indices showed modest discrimination. The adjusted associations varied by model and subgroup. Incremental clinical value was not established.

MedicinaVol. 62(11)
Cukurova University (TR)
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon