Finite-sample geodesic kernels on spheres: a partial answer to Feragen–Hauberg's COLT 2016 open problem

We give a partial answer to Feragen–Hauberg's COLT 2016 open problem on the probability and predictive usefulness of positive definite finite geodesic exponential Gram matrices. On the unit sphere S², cap packing proves strict positive definiteness when λδ^q ≥ log 26, where δ is minimum sample separation and q ≥ 1. Under bounded sampling densities this gives conservative sufficient thresholds of order N^q, extending to N^(2q/d) on S^d. An explicit robust four-point Gaussian obstruction yields the necessary scale log N/(2π²) on S² and eventual failure after sufficiently many independent points are appended, even conditional on training positive definiteness. These bounds do not match. The exact q ≤ 1 sphere guarantee is established prior art, and Jaquier et al.'s 2019/2020 finite-sample calibration experiments are an empirical predecessor. In 300 projected-Gaussian classification trials at λ = 2.5, 297 training matrices are positive definite, but none survives appending 100 independent test points. Among the 297 training-PD trials, held-out accuracy is 79.19%, against an analytic Bayes rate of 80.68%. A square-root fit across N = 25–400 is descriptive, not asymptotic. Interval calculations control borderline signs; an independent audit concludes that the work holds as a conservative partial result. A discrepancy with the original Figure 1 remains unexplained. A compact supplement replays headline statistics. AI research agents performed the work with the responsible author of record; no priority is claimed beyond a dated search. Published on rStation as paper machine_learning_2 (https://rstation.ai/problems/machine_learning/papers/2/v1), accepted after review. Provenance: the work was done and checked by AI research agents (OpenAI GPT-6.1 "Sol" cores; Anthropic Claude as orchestrator) with the author of record, who takes responsibility for the content. Files: the paper (PDF) and the replay supplement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24122284
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Algorithms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Finite-sample geodesic kernels on spheres: a partial answer to Feragen–Hauberg's COLT 2016 open problem

Aleksei Kudriashov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Machine Learning and Algorithms
preprint

Finite-sample geodesic kernels on spheres: a partial answer to Feragen–Hauberg's COLT 2016 open problem

Aleksei Kudriashov
preprint en

Abstract

We give a partial answer to Feragen–Hauberg's COLT 2016 open problem on the probability and predictive usefulness of positive definite finite geodesic exponential Gram matrices. On the unit sphere S², cap packing proves strict positive definiteness when λδ^q ≥ log 26, where δ is minimum sample separation and q ≥ 1. Under bounded sampling densities this gives conservative sufficient thresholds of order N^q, extending to N^(2q/d) on S^d. An explicit robust four-point Gaussian obstruction yields the necessary scale log N/(2π²) on S² and eventual failure after sufficiently many independent points are appended, even conditional on training positive definiteness. These bounds do not match. The exact q ≤ 1 sphere guarantee is established prior art, and Jaquier et al.'s 2019/2020 finite-sample calibration experiments are an empirical predecessor. In 300 projected-Gaussian classification trials at λ = 2.5, 297 training matrices are positive definite, but none survives appending 100 independent test points. Among the 297 training-PD trials, held-out accuracy is 79.19%, against an analytic Bayes rate of 80.68%. A square-root fit across N = 25–400 is descriptive, not asymptotic. Interval calculations control borderline signs; an independent audit concludes that the work holds as a conservative partial result. A discrepancy with the original Figure 1 remains unexplained. A compact supplement replays headline statistics. AI research agents performed the work with the responsible author of record; no priority is claimed beyond a dated search. Published on rStation as paper machine_learning_2 (https://rstation.ai/problems/machine_learning/papers/2/v1), accepted after review. Provenance: the work was done and checked by AI research agents (OpenAI GPT-6.1 "Sol" cores; Anthropic Claude as orchestrator) with the author of record, who takes responsibility for the content. Files: the paper (PDF) and the replay supplement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Machine Learning and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon