Tooth Size Discrepancies in Various Malocclusions: A literature Review

Background: Tooth-size discrepancy (TSD) is an important factor in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, affecting interarch relationships, occlusal stability, and achievement of ideal overjet, overbite, and intercuspation. Bolton analysis is the most commonly used method for assessing interarch tooth-size discrepancies; however, its applicability across different malocclusion groups and populations remains uncertain. Objective: To review the literature on tooth-size discrepancies among different Angle’s malocclusion groups and evaluate the influence of ethnicity and sex on Bolton tooth-size ratios. Materials and Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were searched using the keywords" tooth-size discrepancy," "Bolton analysis," "Angle’s malocclusion," "Class I," "Class II," and "Class III malocclusion."Seminal studies published before 2000, including Bolton’s original investigations, were also considered. Original research articles, observational studies, retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating tooth-size discrepancies were included, whereas case reports, editorials, duplicate studies, and articles lacking relevant data were excluded. A total of 22 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Conclusion: The reviewed literature indicates that clinically significant anterior tooth-size discrepancies occur in approximately 16%–38% of orthodontic patients. Although variations have been reported among Class I, II, and III malocclusions, the association between TSD and malocclusion type remains inconclusive. In contrast, consistent differences in Bolton ratios have been observed among ethnic populations, while sex has minimal influence on tooth-size proportions. Therefore, routine Bolton analysis and development of population-specific standards may improve diagnostic accuracy and individualized orthodontic treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37506/etnn5y77
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Tooth Size Discrepancies in Various Malocclusions: A literature Review

Ram Kishore Ratre, Ketan Goel, Varsha Dogra, Alka Dubey et al.
Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Tooth Size Discrepancies in Various Malocclusions: A literature Review

Ram Kishore Ratre, Ketan Goel, Varsha Dogra, Alka Dubey, Shafna Vakkayil
article en

Abstract

Background: Tooth-size discrepancy (TSD) is an important factor in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, affecting interarch relationships, occlusal stability, and achievement of ideal overjet, overbite, and intercuspation. Bolton analysis is the most commonly used method for assessing interarch tooth-size discrepancies; however, its applicability across different malocclusion groups and populations remains uncertain. Objective: To review the literature on tooth-size discrepancies among different Angle’s malocclusion groups and evaluate the influence of ethnicity and sex on Bolton tooth-size ratios. Materials and Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were searched using the keywords" tooth-size discrepancy," "Bolton analysis," "Angle’s malocclusion," "Class I," "Class II," and "Class III malocclusion."Seminal studies published before 2000, including Bolton’s original investigations, were also considered. Original research articles, observational studies, retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating tooth-size discrepancies were included, whereas case reports, editorials, duplicate studies, and articles lacking relevant data were excluded. A total of 22 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Conclusion: The reviewed literature indicates that clinically significant anterior tooth-size discrepancies occur in approximately 16%–38% of orthodontic patients. Although variations have been reported among Class I, II, and III malocclusions, the association between TSD and malocclusion type remains inconclusive. In contrast, consistent differences in Bolton ratios have been observed among ethnic populations, while sex has minimal influence on tooth-size proportions. Therefore, routine Bolton analysis and development of population-specific standards may improve diagnostic accuracy and individualized orthodontic treatment outcomes.

Indian Journal of Contemporary DentistryVol. 14(2)
Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon