Metabolomic profiling of renal cell carcinoma to identify prognostic markers of metastasis

Background Patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) undergo surveillance for recurrent or metastatic disease following nephrectomy. The primary aim of this study was identification of prognostic biomarkers for metastatic disease. Methods We conducted a retrospective case control study of ccRCC patients treated with surgical resection. At 3 years follow up tumors were classified as cases or non-metastatic tumors based on presence or absence of metastases. Fresh frozen ccRCC tumors and adjacent normal tissues were analyzed by combining a chemical labeling method with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Three different chemical groups were analyzed: Carboxyl, Amine-Phenol, and Hydroxyl. Metabolites were identified using a chemical library for cross-reference. LC-MS results were analyzed with machine learning approaches and statistical models. Unsupervised machine learning (UMAP, Non-negative Matrix Factorization) was used for exploratory analysis of the data. Supervised machine learning, using both linear and nonlinear Support Vector Machines (SVM), was used to construct classification models. Repeated cross-validation was used to avoid overfitting and gain representative classification performance of the model. Results Machine learning and SVM classification models showed good classification performance with an area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.92 for the best-performing model. Metabolites showing statistically significant changes associated with metastasis included the following: 4-Hydroxybutanoic acid, Glutamyl-Glutamic acid, 3-Aminosalicylic acid, Indoxyl sulfate, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropanoic acid, and N-ethylglycine. Conclusions Metabolites which are prognostic for ccRCC metastasis were identified. Impact: Prognostic biomarkers could inform the frequency and intensity of post-operative surveillance of ccRCC. Identification of such biomarkers could aid clinicians in the management of patients with ccRCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361404
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Metabolomic profiling of renal cell carcinoma to identify prognostic markers of metastasis

Dean A. Troyer, Aditya Chakraborty, Nico Verbeeck, Ya-Chun Chan et al.
PLoS ONE
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Metabolomic profiling of renal cell carcinoma to identify prognostic markers of metastasis

Dean A. Troyer, Aditya Chakraborty, Nico Verbeeck, Ya-Chun Chan, Liam Spiers, Kaitlyn Bejar, Theodore Chin, Liang Li, Brian Main, Xiaohang Wang, Olivia Routten, Michael Williams
article en

Abstract

Background Patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) undergo surveillance for recurrent or metastatic disease following nephrectomy. The primary aim of this study was identification of prognostic biomarkers for metastatic disease. Methods We conducted a retrospective case control study of ccRCC patients treated with surgical resection. At 3 years follow up tumors were classified as cases or non-metastatic tumors based on presence or absence of metastases. Fresh frozen ccRCC tumors and adjacent normal tissues were analyzed by combining a chemical labeling method with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Three different chemical groups were analyzed: Carboxyl, Amine-Phenol, and Hydroxyl. Metabolites were identified using a chemical library for cross-reference. LC-MS results were analyzed with machine learning approaches and statistical models. Unsupervised machine learning (UMAP, Non-negative Matrix Factorization) was used for exploratory analysis of the data. Supervised machine learning, using both linear and nonlinear Support Vector Machines (SVM), was used to construct classification models. Repeated cross-validation was used to avoid overfitting and gain representative classification performance of the model. Results Machine learning and SVM classification models showed good classification performance with an area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.92 for the best-performing model. Metabolites showing statistically significant changes associated with metastasis included the following: 4-Hydroxybutanoic acid, Glutamyl-Glutamic acid, 3-Aminosalicylic acid, Indoxyl sulfate, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropanoic acid, and N-ethylglycine. Conclusions Metabolites which are prognostic for ccRCC metastasis were identified. Impact: Prognostic biomarkers could inform the frequency and intensity of post-operative surveillance of ccRCC. Identification of such biomarkers could aid clinicians in the management of patients with ccRCC.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
Norfolk State University (US), University of Alberta (CA), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Cancer Research Center (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon