Comparative Analysis of RNA Quality Between Paired Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Specimens: Implications for Biobanking and Molecular Diagnostics

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy. We therefore aimed to compare RNA concentration, purity, integrity, and laboratory-assigned pre-assay quality control (QC) classifications between paired fresh-frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) specimens from solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: We evaluated 36 pairs of FF and FFPE EUS-FNB specimens for RNA concentration, absorbance ratios, RNA quality numbers (RQNs), and pre-assay QC classifications. FF tissues were placed in RNAlater-containing tubes, snap-frozen and transported in liquid nitrogen before storage in an ultra-low-temperature freezer at −80 °C at the biobank, whereas FFPE specimens were processed and stored according to routine institutional protocols. QC classifications were assigned by the analytical laboratory based on RNA measurements, electropherograms, and estimated assay input requirements. Results: FF specimens had significantly higher RNA concentrations, A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios, and RQNs than paired FFPE specimens (all p < 0.001). No specimens achieved “Pass” status. All 36 FF specimens were classified as “Hold,” whereas 25 of 36 FFPE specimens (69.4%) were classified as “Fail” (p < 0.001). Archival storage duration was significantly longer in the FFPE “Fail” group than in the “Hold” group (median, 5.52 versus 4.14 months; p = 0.006). Conclusions: The FF workflow yielded significantly superior RNA quality metrics and fewer pre-assay QC failures than the FFPE workflow. Placement of specimens in tubes prefilled with RNAlater, followed by snap-freezing and storage at −80 °C, may offer a practical strategy for banking small pancreatic EUS-FNB specimens. However, as pre-assay QC does not guarantee downstream assay success, further validation of profiling performance and long-term stability is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18223611
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparative Analysis of RNA Quality Between Paired Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Specimens: Implications for Biobanking and Molecular Diagnostics

An Na Seo, Chang Min Cho, Jae-Hui Kim, Hyung Jun Kwon et al.
Cancers
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Comparative Analysis of RNA Quality Between Paired Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Specimens: Implications for Biobanking and Molecular Diagnostics

An Na Seo, Chang Min Cho, Jae-Hui Kim, Hyung Jun Kwon, Yu-Jin Ko, Eun Ju Kim, Mihyang Jeon, Dong Wook Lee
article en

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy. We therefore aimed to compare RNA concentration, purity, integrity, and laboratory-assigned pre-assay quality control (QC) classifications between paired fresh-frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) specimens from solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: We evaluated 36 pairs of FF and FFPE EUS-FNB specimens for RNA concentration, absorbance ratios, RNA quality numbers (RQNs), and pre-assay QC classifications. FF tissues were placed in RNAlater-containing tubes, snap-frozen and transported in liquid nitrogen before storage in an ultra-low-temperature freezer at −80 °C at the biobank, whereas FFPE specimens were processed and stored according to routine institutional protocols. QC classifications were assigned by the analytical laboratory based on RNA measurements, electropherograms, and estimated assay input requirements. Results: FF specimens had significantly higher RNA concentrations, A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios, and RQNs than paired FFPE specimens (all p < 0.001). No specimens achieved “Pass” status. All 36 FF specimens were classified as “Hold,” whereas 25 of 36 FFPE specimens (69.4%) were classified as “Fail” (p < 0.001). Archival storage duration was significantly longer in the FFPE “Fail” group than in the “Hold” group (median, 5.52 versus 4.14 months; p = 0.006). Conclusions: The FF workflow yielded significantly superior RNA quality metrics and fewer pre-assay QC failures than the FFPE workflow. Placement of specimens in tubes prefilled with RNAlater, followed by snap-freezing and storage at −80 °C, may offer a practical strategy for banking small pancreatic EUS-FNB specimens. However, as pre-assay QC does not guarantee downstream assay success, further validation of profiling performance and long-term stability is warranted.

CancersVol. 18(22)
Kyungpook National University Hospital (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR)
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon