Delegated agency across the venture cycle: the bright and dark sides of agentic AI in entrepreneurial ventures

Replication package guide: dataset and code for "Delegated agency across the venture cycle" 1. Overview The replication package accompanies the manuscript "Delegated agency across the venture cycle: the bright and dark sides of agentic AI in entrepreneurial ventures" and consists of two files: the workbook Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx (all data, coding, evidence logs and headline results) and the script Analysis_Replication.txt (plain-text Python that reproduces every headline statistic from the workbook). A versioned copy of both is deposited at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24112346. No data are fabricated: every factual record carries a source URL, an evidence tier (A–D) and an access date of 10 November 2026. 2. The dataset workbook (Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx) The workbook contains 18 sheets. Core data sheets hold the firm master (60 ventures: 8 verified adopters, 32 claim-only adopters, 20 matched controls), the three treatment dates per venture (announced, available, verified deployment), 115 funding events totalling US$21,327.3 million, venture status histories, five verified governance incidents, and the two-pass, seven-dimension oversight rubric scores (140 dimension scores; Krippendorff ordinal α = 0.792). The Firm_Period_Panel sheet is the analysis dataset: 512 venture-half-years (2022H1–2026H2) in which funding per period, the binary funding indicator, log funding, event time, and the two post-treatment flags are computed by live formulas (SUMIFS against the Funding_Events sheet), so every panel value can be traced to its underlying dated events. Audit sheets preserve the evidence trail: an Evidence_Log of 40 sourced items, a Screening_Log of 27 excluded candidates with reasons, a Search_Log, the coding matrix, the seven process-tracing chains, headline analysis results, the power analysis, and a missingness/coverage report. Table 1. Workbook sheets at a glance Sheet Contents Cover, Data_Dictionary Version, citation, and variable definitions for every sheet Firm_Master 60 ventures: group, region, sector, founding, status, evidence tier Agent_Adoption Three dated adoption events per venture with evidence tiers Funding_Events 115 dated rounds (US$M) with source URLs Firm_Period_Panel 512 venture-half-years; formula-computed outcomes and treatment flags Status_Events, Governance_Incidents Exit/restructuring histories; five verified incidents with severity Oversight_Rubric, Oversight_Analysis Two-pass scores, α = 0.792; exposure-adjusted event rates Evidence_Log, Screening_Log, Search_Log 40 sourced items (A–D tiers); 27 exclusions; query audit trail Coding_Matrix, Process_Tracing Dimension-level scores; seven dated causal chains Analysis_Results, Power_Analysis All headline statistics (R0–R11); MDES and cluster requirements Missingness_Coverage Coverage and missing-data accounting Note: panel outcomes are live formulas; editing a funding event updates the panel and results on recalculation. 3. The replication code (Analysis_Replication.txt) The replication file is a self-contained Python script in plain-text format. It reads the workbook directly, rebuilds the firm-half-year panel from Funding_Events and Firm_Master (independently of the workbook's formulas, using the same half-year conventions), and prints results blocks R0–R11. Running it end-to-end reproduces every headline number reported in the manuscript and in the workbook's Analysis_Results sheet. ● R0–R2: sample construction, coverage, and the primary verified-adoption difference-in-differences (β = 1.630, cluster-robust p = 0.046; randomization-inference p = 0.010, 500 permutations, fixed seed). ● R3–R6: any-adoption specification (+83%), announcement-date timing comparison (+550%), placebo test (p = 0.130), and the event study with leads, lags and the joint pre-trend test. ● R7–R9: oversight reliability (α = 0.792), oversight–severity correlations with exposure-quarter denominators, and adverse-exit comparisons (Fisher exact tests). ● R10–R11: covariate balance (standardized mean differences) and the power/MDES analysis that frames the estimates as exploratory. Requirements are minimal: Python 3 with pandas, numpy, scipy and statsmodels, plus openpyxl to read the workbook. To replicate, save the file as replication.py in a folder containing Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx and run: python3 replication.py. All randomness is seeded, so output is deterministic. 4. How the pieces fit together The workbook is the source of record; the script is the independent check. The workbook stores each observation once with its source and tier; the script reconstructs the analysis sample from the raw event sheets rather than trusting the pre-computed panel, so any discrepancy between formula-computed and script-computed values would surface immediately. Manuscript tables I–IV and Appendix C are drawn exclusively from the Analysis_Results sheet, which the replication script regenerates in full.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24124810
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Delegated agency across the venture cycle: the bright and dark sides of agentic AI in entrepreneurial ventures

Job Agba Opue
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

Delegated agency across the venture cycle: the bright and dark sides of agentic AI in entrepreneurial ventures

Job Agba Opue
article en

Abstract

Replication package guide: dataset and code for "Delegated agency across the venture cycle" 1. Overview The replication package accompanies the manuscript "Delegated agency across the venture cycle: the bright and dark sides of agentic AI in entrepreneurial ventures" and consists of two files: the workbook Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx (all data, coding, evidence logs and headline results) and the script Analysis_Replication.txt (plain-text Python that reproduces every headline statistic from the workbook). A versioned copy of both is deposited at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24112346. No data are fabricated: every factual record carries a source URL, an evidence tier (A–D) and an access date of 10 November 2026. 2. The dataset workbook (Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx) The workbook contains 18 sheets. Core data sheets hold the firm master (60 ventures: 8 verified adopters, 32 claim-only adopters, 20 matched controls), the three treatment dates per venture (announced, available, verified deployment), 115 funding events totalling US$21,327.3 million, venture status histories, five verified governance incidents, and the two-pass, seven-dimension oversight rubric scores (140 dimension scores; Krippendorff ordinal α = 0.792). The Firm_Period_Panel sheet is the analysis dataset: 512 venture-half-years (2022H1–2026H2) in which funding per period, the binary funding indicator, log funding, event time, and the two post-treatment flags are computed by live formulas (SUMIFS against the Funding_Events sheet), so every panel value can be traced to its underlying dated events. Audit sheets preserve the evidence trail: an Evidence_Log of 40 sourced items, a Screening_Log of 27 excluded candidates with reasons, a Search_Log, the coding matrix, the seven process-tracing chains, headline analysis results, the power analysis, and a missingness/coverage report. Table 1. Workbook sheets at a glance Sheet Contents Cover, Data_Dictionary Version, citation, and variable definitions for every sheet Firm_Master 60 ventures: group, region, sector, founding, status, evidence tier Agent_Adoption Three dated adoption events per venture with evidence tiers Funding_Events 115 dated rounds (US$M) with source URLs Firm_Period_Panel 512 venture-half-years; formula-computed outcomes and treatment flags Status_Events, Governance_Incidents Exit/restructuring histories; five verified incidents with severity Oversight_Rubric, Oversight_Analysis Two-pass scores, α = 0.792; exposure-adjusted event rates Evidence_Log, Screening_Log, Search_Log 40 sourced items (A–D tiers); 27 exclusions; query audit trail Coding_Matrix, Process_Tracing Dimension-level scores; seven dated causal chains Analysis_Results, Power_Analysis All headline statistics (R0–R11); MDES and cluster requirements Missingness_Coverage Coverage and missing-data accounting Note: panel outcomes are live formulas; editing a funding event updates the panel and results on recalculation. 3. The replication code (Analysis_Replication.txt) The replication file is a self-contained Python script in plain-text format. It reads the workbook directly, rebuilds the firm-half-year panel from Funding_Events and Firm_Master (independently of the workbook's formulas, using the same half-year conventions), and prints results blocks R0–R11. Running it end-to-end reproduces every headline number reported in the manuscript and in the workbook's Analysis_Results sheet. ● R0–R2: sample construction, coverage, and the primary verified-adoption difference-in-differences (β = 1.630, cluster-robust p = 0.046; randomization-inference p = 0.010, 500 permutations, fixed seed). ● R3–R6: any-adoption specification (+83%), announcement-date timing comparison (+550%), placebo test (p = 0.130), and the event study with leads, lags and the joint pre-trend test. ● R7–R9: oversight reliability (α = 0.792), oversight–severity correlations with exposure-quarter denominators, and adverse-exit comparisons (Fisher exact tests). ● R10–R11: covariate balance (standardized mean differences) and the power/MDES analysis that frames the estimates as exploratory. Requirements are minimal: Python 3 with pandas, numpy, scipy and statsmodels, plus openpyxl to read the workbook. To replicate, save the file as replication.py in a folder containing Agentic_AI_Panel_Dataset.xlsx and run: python3 replication.py. All randomness is seeded, so output is deterministic. 4. How the pieces fit together The workbook is the source of record; the script is the independent check. The workbook stores each observation once with its source and tier; the script reconstructs the analysis sample from the raw event sheets rather than trusting the pre-computed panel, so any discrepancy between formula-computed and script-computed values would surface immediately. Manuscript tables I–IV and Appendix C are drawn exclusively from the Analysis_Results sheet, which the replication script regenerates in full.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon