The Socio-Ontology of What There is

Abstract Ontology refers both to the study of, and the answer to, the question of what there is, and there is agreement that this issue is important in the social sciences. This article argues that the main step towards a social science–relevant ontology is taken by phenomenology. Phenomenology puts human beings at the center of ontology. This article proposes a single unified ontology that is centered on the human being, is irreducibly social, and encompasses both human beings and things. First, it argues that human beings are ontologically social and shows what this means in contrast to being epistemically social. Second, as an example of the analysis, it shows that institutions and human beings constitute one another. Third, it contends that social science theories make not ontological but ontic or epistemic claims. Together, these contributions reframe ontology as a human-centered social project while clarifying the scope and limits of social scientific theorizing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Studies
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-026-09873-x
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Socio-Ontology of What There is

Patrik Aspers
Human Studies
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

The Socio-Ontology of What There is

Patrik Aspers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ontology refers both to the study of, and the answer to, the question of what there is, and there is agreement that this issue is important in the social sciences. This article argues that the main step towards a social science–relevant ontology is taken by phenomenology. Phenomenology puts human beings at the center of ontology. This article proposes a single unified ontology that is centered on the human being, is irreducibly social, and encompasses both human beings and things. First, it argues that human beings are ontologically social and shows what this means in contrast to being epistemically social. Second, as an example of the analysis, it shows that institutions and human beings constitute one another. Third, it contends that social science theories make not ontological but ontic or epistemic claims. Together, these contributions reframe ontology as a human-centered social project while clarifying the scope and limits of social scientific theorizing.

Human Studies
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon