A novel needleless graft-grasping suture (Ram Knot) for ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical study

Abstract Background This study describes the Ram Knot, a novel fully needleless graft-grasping suture technique for hamstring tendon autograft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) comparing its biomechanical performance with the traditional whipstitch technique. Methods Porcine flexor tendons (n = 12) were standardised and randomly allocated to two groups: Ram Knot (RK) and whipstitch (WS) (n = 6 each). Specimens were subdivided into Single-Step Testing (SST) and Double-Step Testing (DST) protocols (n = 3 per subgroup). Biomechanical testing was performed using an Instron mechanical testing system and consisted of three phases: pre-tensioning (10–100 N), cyclic loading (200 cycles between 10–200 N), and load-to-failure testing. Outcome measures included ultimate failure load, elongation (E1–E3), stiffness, and failure mode. Results All specimens failed by suture rupture. There were no statistically significant differences in ultimate failure load or cyclic displacement between RK and WS groups. In SST conditions, WS demonstrated a higher mean failure load than RK (545.1 N vs 423.5 N), whereas in DST conditions RK demonstrated a higher mean failure load (382.5 N vs 359 N); these differences were not statistically significant. The RK demonstrated significantly greater stiffness (p = 0.004) and reduced elongation at failure (E3) (p = 0.007) compared with WS. Pre-tension elongation (E1) was also significantly lower in the RK group (p = 0.025). Qualitative analysis demonstrated minimal slippage of the primary loop in RK constructs, whereas WS constructs exhibited progressive tendon damage at the suture–tendon interface. Conclusion The Ram Knot demonstrates biomechanical performance comparable to the traditional whipstitch technique, with significantly increased stiffness and reduced elongation. In addition, it provides practical advantages including faster graft preparation, elimination of needle passes, and reduced tendon damage. These findings suggest that Ram Knot represents a mechanically reliable and efficient alternative for hamstring graft preparation in ACL reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11000458/v1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

A novel needleless graft-grasping suture (Ram Knot) for ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical study

Haneen Abdullah Taha AL-Dulaimi, Todd D. Stewart, Rohit Rambani, Abhishek Singh et al.
Research Square
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
preprint

A novel needleless graft-grasping suture (Ram Knot) for ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical study

Haneen Abdullah Taha AL-Dulaimi, Todd D. Stewart, Rohit Rambani, Abhishek Singh, Ram Venkatesh, Tobi Oputa
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study describes the Ram Knot, a novel fully needleless graft-grasping suture technique for hamstring tendon autograft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) comparing its biomechanical performance with the traditional whipstitch technique. Methods Porcine flexor tendons (n = 12) were standardised and randomly allocated to two groups: Ram Knot (RK) and whipstitch (WS) (n = 6 each). Specimens were subdivided into Single-Step Testing (SST) and Double-Step Testing (DST) protocols (n = 3 per subgroup). Biomechanical testing was performed using an Instron mechanical testing system and consisted of three phases: pre-tensioning (10–100 N), cyclic loading (200 cycles between 10–200 N), and load-to-failure testing. Outcome measures included ultimate failure load, elongation (E1–E3), stiffness, and failure mode. Results All specimens failed by suture rupture. There were no statistically significant differences in ultimate failure load or cyclic displacement between RK and WS groups. In SST conditions, WS demonstrated a higher mean failure load than RK (545.1 N vs 423.5 N), whereas in DST conditions RK demonstrated a higher mean failure load (382.5 N vs 359 N); these differences were not statistically significant. The RK demonstrated significantly greater stiffness (p = 0.004) and reduced elongation at failure (E3) (p = 0.007) compared with WS. Pre-tension elongation (E1) was also significantly lower in the RK group (p = 0.025). Qualitative analysis demonstrated minimal slippage of the primary loop in RK constructs, whereas WS constructs exhibited progressive tendon damage at the suture–tendon interface. Conclusion The Ram Knot demonstrates biomechanical performance comparable to the traditional whipstitch technique, with significantly increased stiffness and reduced elongation. In addition, it provides practical advantages including faster graft preparation, elimination of needle passes, and reduced tendon damage. These findings suggest that Ram Knot represents a mechanically reliable and efficient alternative for hamstring graft preparation in ACL reconstruction.

Research Square
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Royal Oldham Hospital (GB), Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Qatar University (QA)
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon