Consumer Protection in Digital Payment Systems: Legal Challenges and Comparative Perspectives in Mongolia, China and South Korea

The rapid development of digital payment systems has transformed financial transactions, improved payment convenience, and expanded access to financial services. However, the increasing use of electronic wallets, mobile payment applications, electronic money, and online payment platforms has also created new consumer protection challenges, including unauthorized transactions, digital fraud, misuse of personal data, technical failures, and difficulties in obtaining compensation. This study aims to conduct a comparative legal analysis of consumer protection in digital payment systems in Mongolia, China, and South Korea. It examines similarities and differences in their legal frameworks, identifies common regulatory challenges, and evaluates potential legal mechanisms for strengthening consumer protection in Mongolia. The study employs doctrinal and comparative legal research methods, drawing on relevant legislation, regulatory instruments, scholarly literature, and institutional approaches to payment-service supervision and dispute resolution. The analysis focuses on the principal legal frameworks governing digital payment services in the three countries. In Mongolia, particular attention is given to the Law on National Payment System, which establishes the legal foundations for payment-service regulation, system security, and the protection of payment users. In China, the study examines the Regulation on the Supervision and Administration of Non-Bank Payment Institutions, which entered into force on 1 May 2024 and strengthened the regulatory framework for non-bank payment service providers. In South Korea, the Electronic Financial Transactions Act is examined with particular reference to electronic transaction security, financial service provider liability, and consumer protection in electronic financial transactions. The comparative analysis is structured around five key dimensions: regulatory authorization and supervision, liability for unauthorized transactions, protection of customer funds, personal data protection and cybersecurity, and consumer complaints and remedies. Through these dimensions, the study evaluates the extent to which existing legal frameworks address emerging risks in digital payment services and provide effective safeguards for consumers. The study emphasizes that effective consumer protection requires more than the formal recognition of consumer rights. It also depends on clearly defined liability mechanisms, transparent obligations for digital payment service providers, accessible dispute resolution procedures, effective compensation mechanisms, and consistent regulatory enforcement. The findings are intended to provide a comparative legal basis for identifying regulatory gaps and developing recommendations to strengthen the legal protection of consumers in Mongolia's rapidly evolving digital payment environment

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1311.12651
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Consumer Protection in Digital Payment Systems: Legal Challenges and Comparative Perspectives in Mongolia, China and South Korea

Khangal Erdenebat, Jankhor Sengeravdan
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Consumer Protection in Digital Payment Systems: Legal Challenges and Comparative Perspectives in Mongolia, China and South Korea

Khangal Erdenebat, Jankhor Sengeravdan
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of digital payment systems has transformed financial transactions, improved payment convenience, and expanded access to financial services. However, the increasing use of electronic wallets, mobile payment applications, electronic money, and online payment platforms has also created new consumer protection challenges, including unauthorized transactions, digital fraud, misuse of personal data, technical failures, and difficulties in obtaining compensation. This study aims to conduct a comparative legal analysis of consumer protection in digital payment systems in Mongolia, China, and South Korea. It examines similarities and differences in their legal frameworks, identifies common regulatory challenges, and evaluates potential legal mechanisms for strengthening consumer protection in Mongolia. The study employs doctrinal and comparative legal research methods, drawing on relevant legislation, regulatory instruments, scholarly literature, and institutional approaches to payment-service supervision and dispute resolution. The analysis focuses on the principal legal frameworks governing digital payment services in the three countries. In Mongolia, particular attention is given to the Law on National Payment System, which establishes the legal foundations for payment-service regulation, system security, and the protection of payment users. In China, the study examines the Regulation on the Supervision and Administration of Non-Bank Payment Institutions, which entered into force on 1 May 2024 and strengthened the regulatory framework for non-bank payment service providers. In South Korea, the Electronic Financial Transactions Act is examined with particular reference to electronic transaction security, financial service provider liability, and consumer protection in electronic financial transactions. The comparative analysis is structured around five key dimensions: regulatory authorization and supervision, liability for unauthorized transactions, protection of customer funds, personal data protection and cybersecurity, and consumer complaints and remedies. Through these dimensions, the study evaluates the extent to which existing legal frameworks address emerging risks in digital payment services and provide effective safeguards for consumers. The study emphasizes that effective consumer protection requires more than the formal recognition of consumer rights. It also depends on clearly defined liability mechanisms, transparent obligations for digital payment service providers, accessible dispute resolution procedures, effective compensation mechanisms, and consistent regulatory enforcement. The findings are intended to provide a comparative legal basis for identifying regulatory gaps and developing recommendations to strengthen the legal protection of consumers in Mongolia's rapidly evolving digital payment environment

Advances in Social Sciences Research JournalVol. 13(11)
University of Internal Affairs of Mongolia (MN)
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon