Harmonizing police crash registers for cross-border fatal-crash modelling: Poland and Queensland

Road safety researchers and agencies may seek to compare crash patterns or evaluate the applicability of severity models developed in other jurisdictions. However, differences in police crash data definitions, coding, and reporting coverage can undermine such comparisons. This study examines whether independently maintained police crash datasets can be harmonized into a common set of indicators that preserves sufficient information for cross-jurisdiction fatal-crash model evaluation, and identifies the limitations of transferring models between these datasets. Event-level casualty-crash records from Poland (SEWIK) and Queensland, Australia (TMR), covering 2015–2024, were harmonized using documented deterministic mapping rules. A structural-support audit excluded seven indicators without counterparts in both datasets, leaving 20 binary indicators describing weather, collision type, road surface, and location (401,805 crashes). Logistic regression and CatBoost models were trained on 2015–2022 data and evaluated on 2023–2024 records, both within and across jurisdictions. Logistic-regression AUC was 0.71 for Poland-to-Queensland transfer and 0.67 for Queensland-to-Poland transfer, compared with 0.76 and 0.73 for locally trained models evaluated on the corresponding test records. Raw predictions from class-weighted models were poorly calibrated; target-jurisdiction Platt recalibration reduced expected calibration error from 0.43 to 0.005 in Queensland and from 0.36 to 0.019 in Poland. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the principal discrimination findings persisted under alternative modelling and sample definitions. The results demonstrate that, for this dataset pair, harmonization preserves partial fatal-crash ranking information but does not establish equivalence of crash characteristics, reporting practices, or predicted probabilities. The study provides a documented procedure for assessing cross-jurisdiction comparability and model transfer; local validation and recalibration remain necessary before operational use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2026.108871
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Harmonizing police crash registers for cross-border fatal-crash modelling: Poland and Queensland

Artur Budzyński, Rita Yi Man Li
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Harmonizing police crash registers for cross-border fatal-crash modelling: Poland and Queensland

Artur Budzyński, Rita Yi Man Li
article en

Abstract

Road safety researchers and agencies may seek to compare crash patterns or evaluate the applicability of severity models developed in other jurisdictions. However, differences in police crash data definitions, coding, and reporting coverage can undermine such comparisons. This study examines whether independently maintained police crash datasets can be harmonized into a common set of indicators that preserves sufficient information for cross-jurisdiction fatal-crash model evaluation, and identifies the limitations of transferring models between these datasets. Event-level casualty-crash records from Poland (SEWIK) and Queensland, Australia (TMR), covering 2015–2024, were harmonized using documented deterministic mapping rules. A structural-support audit excluded seven indicators without counterparts in both datasets, leaving 20 binary indicators describing weather, collision type, road surface, and location (401,805 crashes). Logistic regression and CatBoost models were trained on 2015–2022 data and evaluated on 2023–2024 records, both within and across jurisdictions. Logistic-regression AUC was 0.71 for Poland-to-Queensland transfer and 0.67 for Queensland-to-Poland transfer, compared with 0.76 and 0.73 for locally trained models evaluated on the corresponding test records. Raw predictions from class-weighted models were poorly calibrated; target-jurisdiction Platt recalibration reduced expected calibration error from 0.43 to 0.005 in Queensland and from 0.36 to 0.019 in Poland. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the principal discrimination findings persisted under alternative modelling and sample definitions. The results demonstrate that, for this dataset pair, harmonization preserves partial fatal-crash ranking information but does not establish equivalence of crash characteristics, reporting practices, or predicted probabilities. The study provides a documented procedure for assessing cross-jurisdiction comparability and model transfer; local validation and recalibration remain necessary before operational use.

Accident Analysis & PreventionVol. 241
Silesian University of Technology (PL), University of Florida (US)
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon