Alpine mires support distinct and vulnerable plant–pollinator networks compared to grasslands

Abstract Alpine mires are highly threatened habitats that support specialized biodiversity, yet their pollinator communities and plant–pollinator interactions remain poorly known. We compared plant and pollinator communities and their interaction networks in five alpine mires and five adjacent grasslands across the Western Italian Alps to assess differences in composition, network structure and robustness to species loss. Vegetation and pollinators, including hoverflies, bees, beetles and butterflies, were surveyed using standardized protocols. Mires supported lower plant and pollinator richness than grasslands, although 57.3% of mire plants and 47.2% of mire pollinators were recorded exclusively in this habitat. Plant and pollinator communities differed significantly between habitats, and macroplots with more similar plant communities also tended to support more similar pollinator communities. Both habitats hosted species of conservation concern, but mires were notable for several threatened hoverflies, including three Endangered Cheilosia species recorded exclusively there, whereas grasslands hosted two butterfly species listed in Annex IV of the Habitats Directive. Hoverflies showed similar richness and abundance in both habitats and dominated mire communities, whereas bees, beetles and butterflies were richer and more abundant in grasslands. Mire networks were smaller, contained fewer interactions and showed lower network-level specialization. Mire pollinator communities were less robust to the preferential loss of habitat-exclusive plants, while no habitat differences emerged under random plant-loss scenarios. These findings show that alpine mires and grasslands make complementary contributions to pollinator conservation, while small and fragmented mires support distinctive communities and interaction networks particularly vulnerable to vegetation change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11365383/v1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Alpine mires support distinct and vulnerable plant–pollinator networks compared to grasslands

Consolata Siniscalco, Ludovica Oddi, Sara Fantino, L. Dal Bianco et al.
Research Square
Plant and animal studies
preprint

Alpine mires support distinct and vulnerable plant–pollinator networks compared to grasslands

Consolata Siniscalco, Ludovica Oddi, Sara Fantino, L. Dal Bianco, Alessandra Pollo, Francesca Barbero, Umberto Maritano, Irene Piccini, Fernando Soma, Alessandro Biscaccianti, Simone Eusebio Bergò
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Alpine mires are highly threatened habitats that support specialized biodiversity, yet their pollinator communities and plant–pollinator interactions remain poorly known. We compared plant and pollinator communities and their interaction networks in five alpine mires and five adjacent grasslands across the Western Italian Alps to assess differences in composition, network structure and robustness to species loss. Vegetation and pollinators, including hoverflies, bees, beetles and butterflies, were surveyed using standardized protocols. Mires supported lower plant and pollinator richness than grasslands, although 57.3% of mire plants and 47.2% of mire pollinators were recorded exclusively in this habitat. Plant and pollinator communities differed significantly between habitats, and macroplots with more similar plant communities also tended to support more similar pollinator communities. Both habitats hosted species of conservation concern, but mires were notable for several threatened hoverflies, including three Endangered Cheilosia species recorded exclusively there, whereas grasslands hosted two butterfly species listed in Annex IV of the Habitats Directive. Hoverflies showed similar richness and abundance in both habitats and dominated mire communities, whereas bees, beetles and butterflies were richer and more abundant in grasslands. Mire networks were smaller, contained fewer interactions and showed lower network-level specialization. Mire pollinator communities were less robust to the preferential loss of habitat-exclusive plants, while no habitat differences emerged under random plant-loss scenarios. These findings show that alpine mires and grasslands make complementary contributions to pollinator conservation, while small and fragmented mires support distinctive communities and interaction networks particularly vulnerable to vegetation change.

Research Square
University of Turin (IT), University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL)
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon