Bridging knowledge and practice: a validated scale for sustainability literacy in higher education

Sustainability education requires learners to develop knowledge, values, competencies and action-oriented behaviors, yet existing instruments capture only parts of this construct knowledge in the Sulitest and Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge; consciousness and attitudes in the Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire and Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale, rely largely on school-age or Western samples, and offer limited confirmatory evidence of their structure. To fill this gap, this study developed and validated the four-dimensional St Aloysius- Sustainability Literacy Scale (SA-SLS) instrument, capturing Cognitive Sustainability Literacy, Ethical and Value Orientation, Transformative Competencies, and Sustainability Engagement and Action. The scale development consisted of a rigorous series of literature-based item generation, expert review and pre-testing, as well as an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on one random subsample followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample of 1,068 university students. A robust four-factor structure was confirmed. Factor loadings of items ranged from 0.74 to 0.885. Internal consistency was good for all constructs, with Cronbach's alpha and Composite Reliability (CR) above 0.70 (CR = 0.846–0.884). Convergent validity was confirmed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE = 0.563–0.602), discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell–Larcker criterion, with maximum shared variance being lower than AVE for all constructs. Content validity was also confirmed, with Aiken's V coefficients above 0.70 for representativeness, importance, and clarity for all 41 items. The fit of the model indices were adequate or above recommended values (χ 2 /df = 2.236, RMSEA = 0.042, SRMR = 0.048, CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.967, NFI = 0.948, GFI = 0.922, AGFI = 0.923). These results support a multidimensional, four-factor conceptualization of sustainability literacy comprising knowledge, values, competencies, and action, extending prior single- or partial-dimension instruments by operationalizing these four dimensions within one validated measurement model. To summarize, these findings suggest that the SA-SLS offers a psychometrically sound advance in operationalizing sustainability literacy as a multidimensional construct, providing higher education institutions with a tool to assess and benchmark sustainability literacy for curriculum design and SDG-aligned policy, with future work needed to validate it across multiple institutions and cultural contexts to establish broader generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainability
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1985109
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Bridging knowledge and practice: a validated scale for sustainability literacy in higher education

Rajeswari P S, Sheedhal K Reji, Reji P. John, S. G. Goveas et al.
Frontiers in Sustainability
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Bridging knowledge and practice: a validated scale for sustainability literacy in higher education

Rajeswari P S, Sheedhal K Reji, Reji P. John, S. G. Goveas, Glavin Thomas Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Sustainability education requires learners to develop knowledge, values, competencies and action-oriented behaviors, yet existing instruments capture only parts of this construct knowledge in the Sulitest and Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge; consciousness and attitudes in the Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire and Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale, rely largely on school-age or Western samples, and offer limited confirmatory evidence of their structure. To fill this gap, this study developed and validated the four-dimensional St Aloysius- Sustainability Literacy Scale (SA-SLS) instrument, capturing Cognitive Sustainability Literacy, Ethical and Value Orientation, Transformative Competencies, and Sustainability Engagement and Action. The scale development consisted of a rigorous series of literature-based item generation, expert review and pre-testing, as well as an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on one random subsample followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample of 1,068 university students. A robust four-factor structure was confirmed. Factor loadings of items ranged from 0.74 to 0.885. Internal consistency was good for all constructs, with Cronbach's alpha and Composite Reliability (CR) above 0.70 (CR = 0.846–0.884). Convergent validity was confirmed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE = 0.563–0.602), discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell–Larcker criterion, with maximum shared variance being lower than AVE for all constructs. Content validity was also confirmed, with Aiken's V coefficients above 0.70 for representativeness, importance, and clarity for all 41 items. The fit of the model indices were adequate or above recommended values (χ 2 /df = 2.236, RMSEA = 0.042, SRMR = 0.048, CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.967, NFI = 0.948, GFI = 0.922, AGFI = 0.923). These results support a multidimensional, four-factor conceptualization of sustainability literacy comprising knowledge, values, competencies, and action, extending prior single- or partial-dimension instruments by operationalizing these four dimensions within one validated measurement model. To summarize, these findings suggest that the SA-SLS offers a psychometrically sound advance in operationalizing sustainability literacy as a multidimensional construct, providing higher education institutions with a tool to assess and benchmark sustainability literacy for curriculum design and SDG-aligned policy, with future work needed to validate it across multiple institutions and cultural contexts to establish broader generalizability.

Frontiers in SustainabilityVol. 7
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), St. Aloysius (Deemed to Be University) (IN)
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon