A COSMIN-based content validity study of PROMIS GH-10 German version in Switzerland

Abstract Background A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland indicated a limited number of content validity studies. Due to clinicians’ efforts to reduce response burden, several short forms are available, but remain understudied vis-à-vis content validity. The current study utilized the COSMIN framework to examine the PROMIS Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH) German version. Methodology This mixed-methods study utilized semi-structured interviews with n = 8 professionals and n = 16 patients to examine the PROMIS GH-10’s relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Ordinal ratings on 3-point Likert-type scales were examined in conjunction with free-response probes and open feedback. Results From the patient perspective, the German version of the PROMIS-GH demonstrated mixed evidence for content validity. While patients generally found the instrument easy to understand, they found it partially irrelevant due to three items (Global10r, Global08r, and Global07r) and incomplete due to missing domains. On the other side from the healthcare professionals, the instrument is well-received with sufficient content validity. Conclusion This is the first study to examine the content validity of the PROMIS GH-10 for potential use in Switzerland. Although conducted in Switzerland’s majority-German-speaking region, further studies should be conducted in French- and Italian-speaking regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01242-7
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A COSMIN-based content validity study of PROMIS GH-10 German version in Switzerland

Matthew J. Kerry, Andrea Gläßel, Nikola Biller‐Andorno, Thanh Elsener
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Health Education and Validation
article

A COSMIN-based content validity study of PROMIS GH-10 German version in Switzerland

Matthew J. Kerry, Andrea Gläßel, Nikola Biller‐Andorno, Thanh Elsener
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland indicated a limited number of content validity studies. Due to clinicians’ efforts to reduce response burden, several short forms are available, but remain understudied vis-à-vis content validity. The current study utilized the COSMIN framework to examine the PROMIS Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH) German version. Methodology This mixed-methods study utilized semi-structured interviews with n = 8 professionals and n = 16 patients to examine the PROMIS GH-10’s relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Ordinal ratings on 3-point Likert-type scales were examined in conjunction with free-response probes and open feedback. Results From the patient perspective, the German version of the PROMIS-GH demonstrated mixed evidence for content validity. While patients generally found the instrument easy to understand, they found it partially irrelevant due to three items (Global10r, Global08r, and Global07r) and incomplete due to missing domains. On the other side from the healthcare professionals, the instrument is well-received with sufficient content validity. Conclusion This is the first study to examine the content validity of the PROMIS GH-10 for potential use in Switzerland. Although conducted in Switzerland’s majority-German-speaking region, further studies should be conducted in French- and Italian-speaking regions.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
University of Zurich (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon