Evaluation of MGAP and GAP Trauma Scores to Predict Prognosis of Multiple-Trauma Patients

Accurate early prognosis is critical in trauma care. This study evaluated the GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, systolic Pressure) and MGAP (Mechanism, GAP) scores for predicting mortality in multiple-trauma patients. In a retrospective analysis of 708 patients admitted to a single emergency center in 2023, deceased patients (6.9%) showed significantly lower GAP and MGAP scores than survivors (p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.887 for GAP and 0.899 for MGAP, demonstrating very good discriminatory performance. Optimal cut-off points were 18.5 for GAP and 22.5 for MGAP. Both scores are effective tools for predicting mortality at admission, with MGAP providing only marginal incremental value over the simpler GAP score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACTA MEDICA IRANICA
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v64i10.23197
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluation of MGAP and GAP Trauma Scores to Predict Prognosis of Multiple-Trauma Patients

Firouz Amani, Fatemeh Eghtedari, Mohammad Bahrami, Jafar Ghobadi-Samian et al.
ACTA MEDICA IRANICA
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Evaluation of MGAP and GAP Trauma Scores to Predict Prognosis of Multiple-Trauma Patients

Firouz Amani, Fatemeh Eghtedari, Mohammad Bahrami, Jafar Ghobadi-Samian, Mohammadali Jafari-zarea, Naser Javidzadeh
article en

Abstract

Accurate early prognosis is critical in trauma care. This study evaluated the GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, systolic Pressure) and MGAP (Mechanism, GAP) scores for predicting mortality in multiple-trauma patients. In a retrospective analysis of 708 patients admitted to a single emergency center in 2023, deceased patients (6.9%) showed significantly lower GAP and MGAP scores than survivors (p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.887 for GAP and 0.899 for MGAP, demonstrating very good discriminatory performance. Optimal cut-off points were 18.5 for GAP and 22.5 for MGAP. Both scores are effective tools for predicting mortality at admission, with MGAP providing only marginal incremental value over the simpler GAP score.

ACTA MEDICA IRANICA
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon