A non-destructive stress evaluation model for anchorage interfaces integrating contact mechanics and ultrasonic nonlinearity

To assess the stress state of contact interfaces in bridge anchorage systems, a theoretical model integrating contact mechanics and nonlinear acoustics is developed. Based on one-dimensional longitudinal wave scattering theory, an analytical expression for the reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R is derived, incorporating first- and second-order interface stiffnesses K 1 and K 2 . An ellipsoidal asperity multi-stage contact model is introduced as a physically based complement to the power-law model, which is concise but relies on empirical stiffness–pressure fitting. Laboratory graded tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a single-strand anchorage system, together with field tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a multi-strand anchorage system, validate the model. Results show that reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R increases monotonically with contact stress P , reflecting interface compaction and stiffness enhancement. The power-law model is convenient within a calibrated pressure range, but its accuracy depends on fitted parameters C and m and does not explicitly encode surface topography or material properties, limiting extrapolation. The proposed model derives the stiffness–stress relationship from rough-surface topography and material parameters, reducing empirical fitting. In the laboratory single-strand anchorage test, the acoustic characterization model based on the contact model gives a coefficient of determination of 0.9460 for reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R . In the field multi-strand anchorage test, the relative error between the predicted and measured contact stresses is 8.49%. These results confirm the field applicability and engineering reliability of the model for quantitative stress evaluation of anchorage interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217261501265
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A non-destructive stress evaluation model for anchorage interfaces integrating contact mechanics and ultrasonic nonlinearity

Linqiang Zhou, Ji Qian, Conglin Guo
Structural Health Monitoring
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
article

A non-destructive stress evaluation model for anchorage interfaces integrating contact mechanics and ultrasonic nonlinearity

Linqiang Zhou, Ji Qian, Conglin Guo
article en

Abstract

To assess the stress state of contact interfaces in bridge anchorage systems, a theoretical model integrating contact mechanics and nonlinear acoustics is developed. Based on one-dimensional longitudinal wave scattering theory, an analytical expression for the reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R is derived, incorporating first- and second-order interface stiffnesses K 1 and K 2 . An ellipsoidal asperity multi-stage contact model is introduced as a physically based complement to the power-law model, which is concise but relies on empirical stiffness–pressure fitting. Laboratory graded tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a single-strand anchorage system, together with field tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a multi-strand anchorage system, validate the model. Results show that reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R increases monotonically with contact stress P , reflecting interface compaction and stiffness enhancement. The power-law model is convenient within a calibrated pressure range, but its accuracy depends on fitted parameters C and m and does not explicitly encode surface topography or material properties, limiting extrapolation. The proposed model derives the stiffness–stress relationship from rough-surface topography and material parameters, reducing empirical fitting. In the laboratory single-strand anchorage test, the acoustic characterization model based on the contact model gives a coefficient of determination of 0.9460 for reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R . In the field multi-strand anchorage test, the relative error between the predicted and measured contact stresses is 8.49%. These results confirm the field applicability and engineering reliability of the model for quantitative stress evaluation of anchorage interfaces.

Structural Health Monitoring
State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering (CN), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN)
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon