A best-fit framework synthesis of artificial intelligence in secondary education: review protocol

Protocol for a best-fit framework synthesis examining how artificial intelligence is integrated in secondary education (ISCED 2–3), conducted as Task 8.1 of the GenAI project. The a priori framework crosses Bronfenbrenner's ecological levels with the five participatory intervention phases committed to in the project proposal. The protocol states the eligibility criteria, the search strategy for three databases, the nine exclusion reason codes, the tier definitions, the wave-1 sampling manifest that fixed the extraction sample before any full text was read, the appraisal approach (MMAT 2018 for research reports, AACODS for grey literature), the synthesis method, and a dated amendment log. The review is not registered in a registry of systematic reviews. Searches and title and abstract screening were complete before the protocol reached its final form, so prospective registration was never available. This record is a timestamped publication of the protocol, not a registration, and the protocol states which steps were already complete at that date.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24135089
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A best-fit framework synthesis of artificial intelligence in secondary education: review protocol

Metin Şardağ, Gökhan Kaya, Gültekin Çakmakçı
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

A best-fit framework synthesis of artificial intelligence in secondary education: review protocol

Metin Şardağ, Gökhan Kaya, Gültekin Çakmakçı
article en

Abstract

Protocol for a best-fit framework synthesis examining how artificial intelligence is integrated in secondary education (ISCED 2–3), conducted as Task 8.1 of the GenAI project. The a priori framework crosses Bronfenbrenner's ecological levels with the five participatory intervention phases committed to in the project proposal. The protocol states the eligibility criteria, the search strategy for three databases, the nine exclusion reason codes, the tier definitions, the wave-1 sampling manifest that fixed the extraction sample before any full text was read, the appraisal approach (MMAT 2018 for research reports, AACODS for grey literature), the synthesis method, and a dated amendment log. The review is not registered in a registry of systematic reviews. Searches and title and abstract screening were complete before the protocol reached its final form, so prospective registration was never available. This record is a timestamped publication of the protocol, not a registration, and the protocol states which steps were already complete at that date.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kastamonu University (TR)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon