Mind the gap: Sex-specific computational modeling reveals distinct mechanisms in bone fracture healing

Abstract This study presents the first sex-specific computational model of bone fracture healing, addressing the limited and often contradictory understanding of sex differences in this process. An existing inflammation-repair model was adapted using literature-derived sex-specific parameter values. Independent global sensitivity analysis identified several of these parameters among the main drivers of model dynamics. Due to the critical role of inflammation in fracture repair, a non-dimensional timescale analysis was used to characterize the temporal organization of early fracture healing. Two characteristic timescales common to females and males were identified, capturing fast cytokine regulation and slower cellular processes. Although this analysis did not reveal sex-dependent timescales, it provided an interpretative framework within which quantitative sex differences emerged in full-model predictions. These differences included faster macrophage activation and enhanced phagocytosis in females, leading to quicker debris clearance and stronger, more sustained inflammatory responses with elevated anti-inflammatory cytokine production. In contrast, males exhibited higher pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, a shorter inflammatory phase, and higher peaks in skeletal stem/progenitor cell and fibrocartilage densities. Despite these mechanistic differences, the model predicted comparable healing outcomes in females and males. Validation against independent {\it in vivo} data showed good agreement, including the predicted sex-specific differences in the fibrocartilage compartment and similar osteoblast numbers and ossification patterns between sexes. By integrating sex-specific data from diverse experimental sources, often focused on isolated subprocesses, into a unified computational framework, this work reproduces emergent, sex-specific healing dynamics consistent with experimental observations, highlighting the importance of incorporating sex-specific biology into computational models and supporting their use to advance personalized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9558013/v1
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Mind the gap: Sex-specific computational modeling reveals distinct mechanisms in bone fracture healing

Sarah L. Waters, Liesbet Geris, Aurélie Carlier, Kerri‐Ann Norton et al.
Research Square
Bone fractures and treatments
preprint

Mind the gap: Sex-specific computational modeling reveals distinct mechanisms in bone fracture healing

Sarah L. Waters, Liesbet Geris, Aurélie Carlier, Kerri‐Ann Norton, Pieter Ansoms, Jamie Madrigal, Ning Wei, Laura Lafuente-Gracia
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the first sex-specific computational model of bone fracture healing, addressing the limited and often contradictory understanding of sex differences in this process. An existing inflammation-repair model was adapted using literature-derived sex-specific parameter values. Independent global sensitivity analysis identified several of these parameters among the main drivers of model dynamics. Due to the critical role of inflammation in fracture repair, a non-dimensional timescale analysis was used to characterize the temporal organization of early fracture healing. Two characteristic timescales common to females and males were identified, capturing fast cytokine regulation and slower cellular processes. Although this analysis did not reveal sex-dependent timescales, it provided an interpretative framework within which quantitative sex differences emerged in full-model predictions. These differences included faster macrophage activation and enhanced phagocytosis in females, leading to quicker debris clearance and stronger, more sustained inflammatory responses with elevated anti-inflammatory cytokine production. In contrast, males exhibited higher pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, a shorter inflammatory phase, and higher peaks in skeletal stem/progenitor cell and fibrocartilage densities. Despite these mechanistic differences, the model predicted comparable healing outcomes in females and males. Validation against independent {\it in vivo} data showed good agreement, including the predicted sex-specific differences in the fibrocartilage compartment and similar osteoblast numbers and ossification patterns between sexes. By integrating sex-specific data from diverse experimental sources, often focused on isolated subprocesses, into a unified computational framework, this work reproduces emergent, sex-specific healing dynamics consistent with experimental observations, highlighting the importance of incorporating sex-specific biology into computational models and supporting their use to advance personalized treatment strategies.

Research Square
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Maastricht University (NL), Bard College (US), University of Oxford (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon