Myeloma patient outcome scale (MyPOS): cross-cultural adaptation and validity evidence for the Brazilian population

The Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (MyPOS) was developed to monitor symptoms and improve the quality of life of people with multiple myeloma. To adapt to Brazilian culture and investigating the psychometric properties of MyPOS. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, methodological study. Stage 1 consisted of cross-cultural adaptation, which included translation, back-translation, and content validity of the Portuguese version using the Delphi technique. Stage 2 involved searching for evidence of the instrument’s psychometric validity and applying it to a population sample. We assessed data factorability using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett tests. MyPOS’s factorial structure was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), using factor extraction with the robust diagonally weighted least squares method and robust promin rotation method, and retaining factors through parallel analysis with random permutation of data. Internal consistency was measured by composite reliability, and the stability of the extracted factor was assessed using the H-index. To investigate validity evidence through relationships with external measures, EQ-5D-3 L was used. To assess the instrument’s stability, a test-retest was performed at 10- to 14-day intervals. Content validity was obtained through the expert committee’s agreement, and the recommended Content Validity Index of ≥ 0.9 was achieved in both rounds of analysis. The instrument was administered to 145 participants, who were predominantly female (57.93%) and of mixed-race or black (54.48%). Participants’ median age was 68 years (SD: 10.40), and the median time since diagnosis was 29 months (SD: 43.34). EFA suggested retaining two factors in the psychometric analysis. Factor 1 (symptoms and functionality) and factor 2 (emotional response) explained 30.61% and 10.42% of the variance in the data, respectively. The instrument demonstrated multidimensionality, good reliability (ω coefficient for the general questionnaire: 0.873), and replicability of the factorial structure (Latent H > 0.80). This study provided evidence of validity and consistency of the Brazilian version of MyPOS, thereby allowing its use in clinical practice and research on this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-17162-0
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Myeloma patient outcome scale (MyPOS): cross-cultural adaptation and validity evidence for the Brazilian population

Carlos Alberto Leite Filho, Maria Theresa Camilo de Lima, Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico, Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves et al.
BMC Cancer
Health Education and Validation
article

Myeloma patient outcome scale (MyPOS): cross-cultural adaptation and validity evidence for the Brazilian population

Carlos Alberto Leite Filho, Maria Theresa Camilo de Lima, Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico, Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves, Perla Vicari, Walter Moisés Tobias Braga, Tobias Braga, De Domenico
article en

Abstract

The Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (MyPOS) was developed to monitor symptoms and improve the quality of life of people with multiple myeloma. To adapt to Brazilian culture and investigating the psychometric properties of MyPOS. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, methodological study. Stage 1 consisted of cross-cultural adaptation, which included translation, back-translation, and content validity of the Portuguese version using the Delphi technique. Stage 2 involved searching for evidence of the instrument’s psychometric validity and applying it to a population sample. We assessed data factorability using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett tests. MyPOS’s factorial structure was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), using factor extraction with the robust diagonally weighted least squares method and robust promin rotation method, and retaining factors through parallel analysis with random permutation of data. Internal consistency was measured by composite reliability, and the stability of the extracted factor was assessed using the H-index. To investigate validity evidence through relationships with external measures, EQ-5D-3 L was used. To assess the instrument’s stability, a test-retest was performed at 10- to 14-day intervals. Content validity was obtained through the expert committee’s agreement, and the recommended Content Validity Index of ≥ 0.9 was achieved in both rounds of analysis. The instrument was administered to 145 participants, who were predominantly female (57.93%) and of mixed-race or black (54.48%). Participants’ median age was 68 years (SD: 10.40), and the median time since diagnosis was 29 months (SD: 43.34). EFA suggested retaining two factors in the psychometric analysis. Factor 1 (symptoms and functionality) and factor 2 (emotional response) explained 30.61% and 10.42% of the variance in the data, respectively. The instrument demonstrated multidimensionality, good reliability (ω coefficient for the general questionnaire: 0.873), and replicability of the factorial structure (Latent H > 0.80). This study provided evidence of validity and consistency of the Brazilian version of MyPOS, thereby allowing its use in clinical practice and research on this topic.

BMC Cancer
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon