Vibration Mitigation of Footbridges Considering Human-Structure Interaction and Optimization of MTMD Placement and Properties

Abstract Purpose This study investigates the dynamic response of a real footbridge subjected to pedestrian-induced excitation while explicitly accounting for human–structure interaction and evaluates optimized tuned mass damper configurations under non-resonant and resonant walking conditions. Methods The footbridge is represented by a three-dimensional finite element model, and pedestrian–structure interaction is simulated using the previously developed Biodynamic Synchronized Coupled Model (BSCM). Configurations with one, two, and three TMDs are investigated. The previously proposed One-to-One-Based Optimizer (OOBO) is adopted within a two-stage optimization procedure to determine damper locations and mechanical properties, while the dynamic response is obtained through time-domain integration. Results For a mean step frequency of 1.77 Hz, the uncontrolled footbridge remained within the adopted comfort limits. The optimized single TMD reduced maximum displacement, acceleration, and velocity by 8.74%, 36.10%, and 37.98%, respectively. Under resonance, generated by a mean step frequency of 1.96 Hz whose second harmonic coincides with the 3.92 Hz vertical mode, the uncontrolled peak acceleration exceeded the BS 5400 and ONT 83 limits. The optimized single TMD reduced maximum displacement by 43.97%, maximum acceleration by 68.26%, and RMS acceleration by 69.58%. Conclusion Increasing the number of dampers for a fixed total TMD mass does not necessarily improve vibration mitigation. Optimal placement depends on the excitation characteristics and structural mode shapes. The contribution of the present study lies in the integrated application of biodynamic human–structure interaction modeling and optimization of TMD placement and properties to assess passive vibration control under different excitation conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-026-02895-w
Primary Topic
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Vibration Mitigation of Footbridges Considering Human-Structure Interaction and Optimization of MTMD Placement and Properties

Herbert Martins Gomes, Marcelo A. Toso, Leonardo D. A. Rocha
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
article

Vibration Mitigation of Footbridges Considering Human-Structure Interaction and Optimization of MTMD Placement and Properties

Herbert Martins Gomes, Marcelo A. Toso, Leonardo D. A. Rocha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study investigates the dynamic response of a real footbridge subjected to pedestrian-induced excitation while explicitly accounting for human–structure interaction and evaluates optimized tuned mass damper configurations under non-resonant and resonant walking conditions. Methods The footbridge is represented by a three-dimensional finite element model, and pedestrian–structure interaction is simulated using the previously developed Biodynamic Synchronized Coupled Model (BSCM). Configurations with one, two, and three TMDs are investigated. The previously proposed One-to-One-Based Optimizer (OOBO) is adopted within a two-stage optimization procedure to determine damper locations and mechanical properties, while the dynamic response is obtained through time-domain integration. Results For a mean step frequency of 1.77 Hz, the uncontrolled footbridge remained within the adopted comfort limits. The optimized single TMD reduced maximum displacement, acceleration, and velocity by 8.74%, 36.10%, and 37.98%, respectively. Under resonance, generated by a mean step frequency of 1.96 Hz whose second harmonic coincides with the 3.92 Hz vertical mode, the uncontrolled peak acceleration exceeded the BS 5400 and ONT 83 limits. The optimized single TMD reduced maximum displacement by 43.97%, maximum acceleration by 68.26%, and RMS acceleration by 69.58%. Conclusion Increasing the number of dampers for a fixed total TMD mass does not necessarily improve vibration mitigation. Optimal placement depends on the excitation characteristics and structural mode shapes. The contribution of the present study lies in the integrated application of biodynamic human–structure interaction modeling and optimization of TMD placement and properties to assess passive vibration control under different excitation conditions.

Journal of Vibration Engineering & TechnologiesVol. 14(8)
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon