A Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Policies

As an important resource for strengthening national identity and enhancing cultural soft power, intangible cultural heritage (ICH) has become an increasingly integral component of national cultural strategies. In recent years, the Chinese government has issued a large number of ICH-related policies, providing institutional support for the protection, transmission, and utilization of ICH. This study integrates keyword-frequency analysis, co-occurrence networks, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling, and an adjusted Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index to assess the structural coverage of China’s ICH policies. A total of 5297 records were identified, of which 607 policy documents were retained for exploratory text analysis. Sixteen policies issued between 2011 and 2023 were selected for detailed assessment. The indicator framework comprises nine primary dimensions and 48 secondary indicators, with seven substantive dimensions contributing to the adjusted PMC index and two categorical dimensions reported separately. LDA analysis identified ten topics, subsequently organized into five thematic areas. The policies achieve an average adjusted PMC score of 6.44 on a seven-point scale, with individual scores ranging from 6.13 to 7.00, indicating extensive coverage of the predefined policy-text indicators. A leave-one-dimension-out analysis yielded Spearman rank correlations ranging from 0.844 to 1.000. The findings identify uneven coverage across substantive dimensions, limited discrimination in certain indicators, and differences in the intended scope of comprehensive and specialized policy instruments. Future policy design should strengthen policy precision, long-term support for inheritors, institutional coordination, and the operational specificity of implementation mechanisms. The results describe policy-text coverage rather than directly measuring implementation effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182211509
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Policies

Lingyan Lv, Xiaojun Li
Sustainability
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

A Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Policies

Lingyan Lv, Xiaojun Li
article en

Abstract

As an important resource for strengthening national identity and enhancing cultural soft power, intangible cultural heritage (ICH) has become an increasingly integral component of national cultural strategies. In recent years, the Chinese government has issued a large number of ICH-related policies, providing institutional support for the protection, transmission, and utilization of ICH. This study integrates keyword-frequency analysis, co-occurrence networks, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling, and an adjusted Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index to assess the structural coverage of China’s ICH policies. A total of 5297 records were identified, of which 607 policy documents were retained for exploratory text analysis. Sixteen policies issued between 2011 and 2023 were selected for detailed assessment. The indicator framework comprises nine primary dimensions and 48 secondary indicators, with seven substantive dimensions contributing to the adjusted PMC index and two categorical dimensions reported separately. LDA analysis identified ten topics, subsequently organized into five thematic areas. The policies achieve an average adjusted PMC score of 6.44 on a seven-point scale, with individual scores ranging from 6.13 to 7.00, indicating extensive coverage of the predefined policy-text indicators. A leave-one-dimension-out analysis yielded Spearman rank correlations ranging from 0.844 to 1.000. The findings identify uneven coverage across substantive dimensions, limited discrimination in certain indicators, and differences in the intended scope of comprehensive and specialized policy instruments. Future policy design should strengthen policy precision, long-term support for inheritors, institutional coordination, and the operational specificity of implementation mechanisms. The results describe policy-text coverage rather than directly measuring implementation effectiveness.

SustainabilityVol. 18(22)
China University of Geosciences (CN), Guilin University of Technology (CN)
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon